Tim C. de Wit

1.9k citations
29 papers · 1.0k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Tim C. de Wit

29 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Tim C. de Wit
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 552
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 481
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 287
  • Hepatology 88
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 215
Replace Laurent Canetti with:
Laurent Canetti Switzerland
Hajime Otsuka Japan
Suguru Dobashi Japan
Rowan M. Thomson Canada
J. W. Harris United States
Roberto Franceschini Italy
M. K. Daniel United States
Hajime Aoki Japan
Hung‐Sheng Tsao United States
William Cottrell United States
Tim C. de Wit relative to Laurent Canetti Switzerland Laurent Canetti's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.6×
Laurent Canetti · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tim C. de Wit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tim C. de Wit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim C. de Wit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim C. de Wit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tim C. de Wit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim C. de Wit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim C. de Wit. The network helps show where Tim C. de Wit may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tim C. de Wit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tim C. de Wit Line = papers co-authored together Tim C. de Wit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000241
2 200493
3 200175
4 200269
5 200754
6 200753
7 200848
8 200247
9 200647
10 200935
11 201231
12 200626
13 201725
14 201024
15 200721
16 200521
17 201417
18 201815
19 201215
20 201013

About Tim C. de Wit

Tim C. de Wit is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Molecular Biology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (10 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (5 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (5 papers), Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (4 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (2 papers) and Neurological disorders and treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (552 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (481 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (287 citations), Hepatology (88 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (215 citations). Tim C. de Wit has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and France. Frequent co-authors include Eric Bergshoeff, M. de Roo, Eduardo Eyras, Sudhakar Panda, Antoine Van Proeyen, Sorin Cucu, Freek J. Beekman, Stefan Vandoren, Jos Gheerardyn and Steven Staelens. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of High Energy Physics, Classical and Quantum Gravity, Physics in Medicine and Biology, EJNMMI Research and European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact