Thomas Zack
Impact in
- Geophysics top 0.1%
- Geological and Geochemical Analysis
- earthquake and tectonic studies
- High-pressure geophysics and materials
- Geochemistry and Petrology top 0.2%
- Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
Papers in
- Geophysics 115
- Geological and Geochemical Analysis 114
- earthquake and tectonic studies 57
- High-pressure geophysics and materials 41
-
- Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis 18
- Co-authors
- Andreas Kronz (8 shared papers)George Luiz Luvizotto (12 shared papers)Hilmar von Eynatten (8 shared papers)Renato Moraes (3 shared papers)Stephen Foley (3 shared papers)Matthias G. Barth (13 shared papers)Toby Rivers (3 shared papers)K. Johan Hogmalm (7 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Thomas Zack
147 papers receiving 7.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Geophysics 6.5k
- Geochemistry and Petrology 1.4k
- Artificial Intelligence 3.0k
- Paleontology 552
- Atmospheric Science 741
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Zack
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Zack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Zack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Zack more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Zack
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Zack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Zack. The network helps show where Thomas Zack may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Zack, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 152 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 496 | |
| 2 | 2002 | 343 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 298 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 292 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 258 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 250 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 240 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 228 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 227 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 196 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 180 | |
| 12 | 2008 | 176 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 163 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 152 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 140 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 138 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 136 | |
| 18 | 2011 | 136 | |
| 19 | 2008 | 122 | |
| 20 | 2001 | 116 |
About Thomas Zack
Thomas Zack is a scholar working on Geophysics, Geochemistry and Petrology, Artificial Intelligence, Atmospheric Science and Paleontology, having authored 152 papers that have together received 7.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geological and Geochemical Analysis (114 papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (57 papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (48 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (41 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (29 papers), Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis (18 papers), Radioactive element chemistry and processing (10 papers) and Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geophysics (6.5k citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (1.4k citations), Artificial Intelligence (3.0k citations), Paleontology (552 citations) and Atmospheric Science (741 citations). Thomas Zack has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Germany and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Andreas Kronz, George Luiz Luvizotto, Hilmar von Eynatten, Renato Moraes, Stephen Foley, Matthias G. Barth, Toby Rivers, K. Johan Hogmalm, Silke Triebold and Gültekin Topuz. Their work appears in journals such as Chemical Geology, Lithos, Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research, Earth and Planetary Science Letters and Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.