Thomas Wischmeyer
Impact in
- Law top 2%
- Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Freedom of Expression and Defamation
-
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Papers in
- Law 15
- Digitalization, Law, and Regulation 8
- Freedom of Expression and Defamation 3
- Law and Political Science 3
-
- Administrative Law and Governance 5
- Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies 4
- European and International Law Studies 3
- Journals
- European Law Journal (1 paper)International Journal of Constitutional Law (1 paper)German Law Journal (1 paper)JuristenZeitung (2 papers)Archiv für Rechts- und Wirtschaftsphilosophie (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Germany
In The Last Decade
Thomas Wischmeyer
16 papers receiving 189 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Law 90
- Health Informatics 13
- Safety Research 39
- Political Science and International Relations 66
- Industrial relations 2
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Wischmeyer
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Wischmeyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Wischmeyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Wischmeyer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Wischmeyer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Wischmeyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Wischmeyer. The network helps show where Thomas Wischmeyer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Wischmeyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 67 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 57 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 30 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 16 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 10 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2006 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2008 | 0 | |
| 18 | 2011 | 0 | |
| 19 | "moral Luck" In Moral Und Recht: Ein induktiver Vergleich zweier normativer Ordnungen anhand des Umgangs mit dem Zufall | 2013 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 0 |
About Thomas Wischmeyer
Thomas Wischmeyer is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations, Philosophy, Development and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 27 papers that have together received 217 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digitalization, Law, and Regulation (8 papers), Administrative Law and Governance (5 papers), Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies (4 papers), European and International Law Studies (3 papers), Freedom of Expression and Defamation (3 papers), Law and Political Science (3 papers), Legal and Constitutional Studies (2 papers) and Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (90 citations), Health Informatics (13 citations), Safety Research (39 citations), Political Science and International Relations (66 citations) and Industrial relations (2 citations). Thomas Wischmeyer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany. Frequent co-authors include Andreas Voßkuhle and Lisa Maria Herzog. Their work appears in journals such as European Law Journal, International Journal of Constitutional Law, German Law Journal, JuristenZeitung and Archiv für Rechts- und Wirtschaftsphilosophie.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.