Thomas Stoeger

3.4k citations
29 papers · 1.4k · 1 hit paper · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Stoeger

27 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Thomas Stoeger's Hit Papers

The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly 2025 · 24 citations
240Years since publication5101520

Peers

Thomas Stoeger
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Aging 42
  • Biophysics 134
  • Molecular Biology 1.0k
  • Cell Biology 148
  • Health Informatics 7
Replace Eleanor Williams with:
Eleanor Williams United Kingdom
Richard Sever United States
Gabriella Rustici United Kingdom
Cecilia N. Arighi United States
Tin Nguyen United States
Matthew Brush United States
Benjamin Bolival United States
Jasmin Coulombe‐Huntington Canada
Olivier Cinquin United States
Neil D. Clarke Singapore
Thomas Stoeger relative to Eleanor Williams United Kingdom Eleanor Williams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Eleanor Williams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Stoeger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Stoeger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Stoeger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Stoeger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Stoeger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Stoeger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Stoeger. The network helps show where Thomas Stoeger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Stoeger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Stoeger Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Stoeger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009250
2 2015240
3 2013214
4 2018151
5 201684
6 201577
7 202266
8 200664
9 201449
10 201525
11 201325
12 202324
13
The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly
Hit paper breakdown →
202524
14 202224
15 202322
16 202220
17 202418
18 202018
19 201612
20 202212

About Thomas Stoeger

Thomas Stoeger is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Information Systems and Management, Artificial Intelligence and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics (6 papers), Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (6 papers), Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (5 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (4 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (3 papers), Academic integrity and plagiarism (2 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers) and Gene expression and cancer classification (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (42 citations), Biophysics (134 citations), Molecular Biology (1.0k citations), Cell Biology (148 citations) and Health Informatics (7 citations). Thomas Stoeger has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Lucas Pelkmans, Nico Battich, Luı́s A. Nunes Amaral, Richard I. Morimoto, Martin Gerlach, Juergen A. Knoblich, Masakazu Yamazaki, Doris Chen, Barry J. Dickson and Georg Dietzl. Their work appears in journals such as eLife, Nature Methods, Cell, Nature and PLoS Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact