Thomas Stewart

53 papers receiving 937 citations

Peers

Thomas Stewart
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 67
  • Dermatology 80
  • Immunology 179
  • Cancer Research 102
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 118
Replace Gang Cheng with:
Gang Cheng China
Ji‐Yeon Kim South Korea
June A. Peters United States
Mary Ellen Ross United States
Jing Wen China
Clara Gaff Australia
Tony Fouweather United Kingdom
Susan L. Woods Australia
Julie Sanders United Kingdom
Robert J. Coughlan Ireland
Thomas Stewart relative to Gang Cheng China Gang Cheng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.3×
Gang Cheng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Stewart

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Stewart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Stewart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Stewart more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Stewart

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Stewart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Stewart. The network helps show where Thomas Stewart may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Stewart, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Stewart Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Stewart links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999200
2 2008149
3 200052
4 198348
5 200446
6 201843
7 200640
8 201136
9 195134
10 201833
11 201428
12 200727
13 200924
14 201821
15
The treatment of pilonidal sinus by phenol injection.
196919
16 200615
17 198615
18 198314
19 199813
20 201713

About Thomas Stewart

Thomas Stewart is a scholar working on Education, Epidemiology, Dermatology, Physiology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include School Choice and Performance (9 papers), Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies (7 papers), Parental Involvement in Education (5 papers), Dermatology and Skin Diseases (4 papers), Education Systems and Policy (4 papers), Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (3 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (3 papers) and Autoimmune Bullous Skin Diseases (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (67 citations), Dermatology (80 citations), Immunology (179 citations), Cancer Research (102 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (118 citations). Thomas Stewart has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Scott I. Abrams, P.-B. Andersson, Emmanuelle Waubant, Ann Frye, Karen Miller, Patrick J. Wolf, D Goodkin, Lauren Gee, Peter Bacchetti and R. Sloan. Their work appears in journals such as Australasian Journal of Dermatology, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Academic Medicine, Dermatologic Surgery and Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact