Thomas Stapleton

30 papers receiving 288 citations

Peers

Thomas Stapleton
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Developmental Neuroscience 26
  • Nephrology 39
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 67
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 21
  • Physiology 56
Replace Liza M. Cohen with:
Liza M. Cohen United States
IvanD.A. Johnston United Kingdom
David A. Schulsinger United States
Y Furuya Japan
K. Scheld Germany
Gonzalo Dí­az Chile
L Reinken Germany
B Thalme Sweden
Sufin Yap United Kingdom
Jeffrey Wang United States
Thomas Stapleton relative to Liza M. Cohen United States Liza M. Cohen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.7×
Liza M. Cohen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Stapleton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Stapleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Stapleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Stapleton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Stapleton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Stapleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Stapleton. The network helps show where Thomas Stapleton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Stapleton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Stapleton Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Stapleton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 195195
2 195386
3 195731
4 196228
5 195619
6 195518
7 195410
8 20137
9 19546
10
Environmental Control and Life Support System Developed for Deep Space Travel
20176
11
Environmental Control and Life Support for Deep Space Travel
20165
12
Torrefaction Processing for Human Solid Waste Management
20164
13 20133
14 19783
15 19713
16 19843
17 19753
18 19713
19 20132
20 19632

About Thomas Stapleton

Thomas Stapleton is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Surgery, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 35 papers that have together received 350 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spacecraft Design and Technology (5 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (5 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies (3 papers), Planetary Science and Exploration (3 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (2 papers), Renal function and acid-base balance (2 papers) and Dermatological and COVID-19 studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (26 citations), Nephrology (39 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (67 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (21 citations) and Physiology (56 citations). Thomas Stapleton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Reginald Lightwood, William M. Wallace, B Friis-Hansen, W. B. Macdonald, Brian Turner, Tadhg Stapleton, R. Kim Oates, Michael K. Ewert, Moises Béhar and Miguel Torres‐Torriti. Their work appears in journals such as The Medical Journal of Australia, The Lancet, PEDIATRICS, Acta Paediatrica and The Journal of Pediatrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact