Thomas Smith

40 papers receiving 319 citations

Peers

Thomas Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Research and Theory 10
  • Leadership and Management 6
  • History 39
  • General Health Professions 96
  • Public Administration 12
Replace Lesley Smith with:
Lesley Smith United Kingdom
G. W. Roberts Australia
John G. Fox United States
Kim Tolley United Kingdom
Alan Campbell United Kingdom
Joe Sim United Kingdom
Joanna Macrae United Kingdom
Warwick Frost Australia
Kevin J. Hayes United States
Martin Gorsky United Kingdom
Thomas Smith relative to Lesley Smith United Kingdom Lesley Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Lesley Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Smith. The network helps show where Thomas Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Smith Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201088
2
De republica Anglorum
197076
3 201125
4 201224
5 201018
6 201117
7 196715
8
A Discourse of the Common Weal of This Realm of England
201013
9 199213
10 200312
11 199211
12
Hospitalized elders: changes in functional and mental status.
200410
13 20196
14
Occupational Attainment and Mobility of Hispanics in a Changing Economy
20056
15 19595
16 20065
17 19575
18 20014
19 20094
20
River of dreams
20074

About Thomas Smith

Thomas Smith is a scholar working on History, Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Political Science and International Relations and General Health Professions, having authored 50 papers that have together received 400 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Travel Writing and Literature (4 papers), Rocket and propulsion systems research (3 papers), American Sports and Literature (3 papers), Evaluation and Performance Assessment (2 papers), Insurance and Financial Risk Management (2 papers), Race, History, and American Society (2 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (2 papers) and American Environmental and Regional History (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (10 citations), Leadership and Management (6 citations), History (39 citations), General Health Professions (96 citations) and Public Administration (12 citations). Thomas Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Maralynne D. Mitcham, John R. Raymond, Amy V. Blue, Raymond S. Greenberg, Ajay Kothari, Kevin Bowcutt, Jan O. M. Broek, Joyce J. Fitzpatrick, Scott Loveridge and Mary T. Quinn Griffin. Their work appears in journals such as Economic Geography, Parliamentary Affairs, Geographical Review, a/b Auto/Biography Studies and Journalism.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact