Thomas Smith

57 papers receiving 764 citations

Peers

Thomas Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 363
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 111
  • Geophysics 120
  • Atmospheric Science 140
  • Environmental Chemistry 74
Replace H.J. Hofmann with:
H.J. Hofmann Switzerland
H. B. Franz United States
G. Cini Castagnoli Italy
M. Fruneau France
K. Rages United States
G. Bonino Italy
J. P. Bibring France
Paul D. Lowman United States
R.W. Stoenner United States
Yayoi N. Miura Japan
Thomas Smith relative to H.J. Hofmann Switzerland H.J. Hofmann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×21×
H.J. Hofmann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Smith. The network helps show where Thomas Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Smith Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009148
2 1996120
3 199677
4 201457
5 200243
6 200039
7 199219
8 201117
9 199415
10 201915
11 200215
12 201115
13 199514
14 201814
15 197813
16 202012
17 200610
18 20249
19 20218
20 20178

About Thomas Smith

Thomas Smith is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Geophysics, Atmospheric Science and Ecology, having authored 58 papers that have together received 798 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astro and Planetary Science (26 papers), Planetary Science and Exploration (20 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (10 papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (8 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (7 papers), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (7 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (6 papers) and Quantum Mechanics and Applications (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (363 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (111 citations), Geophysics (120 citations), Atmospheric Science (140 citations) and Environmental Chemistry (74 citations). Thomas Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and France. Frequent co-authors include Mark A. Hennings, C. T. Pillinger, Frank J. Berry, P. A. Bland, Dominique Poirier, Aurélia Mouret, Pierre Anschutz, Jonathan Deborde, Pascal Lécroart and Stéphane Bujan. Their work appears in journals such as Meteoritics and Planetary Science, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Physics Letters A, Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences and Journal of Modern Optics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact