Thomas Sharkey

12 papers receiving 200 citations

Peers

Thomas Sharkey
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Applied Psychology 28
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 76
  • Pharmacy 8
  • Clinical Psychology 34
  • General Health Professions 38
Replace Jen Unwin with:
Jen Unwin United Kingdom
Hugues Plourde Canada
Katelyn R Garcia United States
J. Hooson United Kingdom
Reija Männikkö Finland
Tanja Tilles‐Tirkkonen Finland
Adline Ghazi United States
María Soledad Arietaleanizbeaskoa Spain
Carmen Fernández-Alonso Spain
Claire R. Draffin United Kingdom
Thomas Sharkey relative to Jen Unwin United Kingdom Jen Unwin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Jen Unwin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Sharkey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Sharkey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Sharkey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Sharkey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Sharkey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Sharkey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Sharkey. The network helps show where Thomas Sharkey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Sharkey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Sharkey Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Sharkey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 201975
2 202043
3 202034
4 202122
5 202017
6 19523
7
Diabetes mellitus--present problems and new research.
19713
8 20202
9 19712
10 20251
11 20201
12 19711
13 19681

About Thomas Sharkey

Thomas Sharkey is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology, General Health Professions, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Surgery, having authored 13 papers that have together received 205 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (5 papers), Physical Activity and Health (3 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (2 papers), Health and Lifestyle Studies (2 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (2 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (1 paper), Diabetes and associated disorders (1 paper) and Nutritional Studies and Diet (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (28 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (76 citations), Pharmacy (8 citations), Clinical Psychology (34 citations) and General Health Professions (38 citations). Thomas Sharkey has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Megan Whatnall, Aaron Bezzina, Lee Ashton, Melinda Hutchesson, Clare E. Collins, Elroy J. Aguiar, Rebecca L. Haslam, Rebecca Williams, R. Peter Alston and Amy Claxton. Their work appears in journals such as Nutrition Journal, Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, Nutrients, British Journal of Dermatology and Obesity Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact