Thomas Schleid

8.3k citations
567 papers · 6.9k · h-index 34

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Schleid

542 papers receiving 6.8k citations

Peers

Thomas Schleid
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Inorganic Chemistry 3.6k
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 3.6k
  • Condensed Matter Physics 858
  • Materials Chemistry 3.3k
  • Catalysis 404
Replace Joseph W. Kolis with:
Joseph W. Kolis United States
Thomas F. Fässler Germany
Michael Ruck Germany
Slavi C. Sevov United States
Ángeles Monge Spain
Enrique Gutiérrez‐Puebla Spain
Wolfgang Bensch Germany
Nathaniel E. Brese United States
M.I. Arriortua Spain
Jiang‐Gao Mao China
Thomas Schleid relative to Joseph W. Kolis United States Joseph W. Kolis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Joseph W. Kolis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Schleid

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Schleid's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Schleid with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Schleid more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Schleid

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Schleid. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Schleid. The network helps show where Thomas Schleid may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Schleid, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Schleid Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Schleid links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 567 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008214
2 2005101
3 198998
4 200897
5 201595
6 198992
7 200382
8 198580
9 200469
10 201862
11 198958
12 199157
13 200056
14 200955
15 200351
16 198750
17 200447
18 201246
19 198643
20 198742

About Thomas Schleid

Thomas Schleid is a scholar working on Inorganic Chemistry, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Materials Chemistry, Organic Chemistry and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, having authored 567 papers that have together received 6.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crystal Structures and Properties (308 papers), Inorganic Chemistry and Materials (285 papers), Inorganic Fluorides and Related Compounds (98 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Characterization (71 papers), Iron-based superconductors research (71 papers), Luminescence Properties of Advanced Materials (63 papers), Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography (62 papers) and Radioactive element chemistry and processing (48 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Inorganic Chemistry (3.6k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (3.6k citations), Condensed Matter Physics (858 citations), Materials Chemistry (3.3k citations) and Catalysis (404 citations). Thomas Schleid has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Falk Lissner, Gerd Meyer, Ingo Hartenbach, Ioannis Tiritiris, Sabine Strobel, Helge Müller‐Bunz, Wolfgang Kaim, Jan Fiedler, Frank A. Weber and Biprajit Sarkar. Their work appears in journals such as Zeitschrift für anorganische und allgemeine Chemie, Journal of Solid State Chemistry, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, Inorganic Chemistry and European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact