Thomas Schelle

543 citations
20 papers · 350 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Schelle

17 papers receiving 337 citations

Peers

Thomas Schelle
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 298
  • Neurology 96
  • Surgery 262
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 59
  • Rehabilitation 19
Replace Henrich Kele with:
Henrich Kele Germany
T. Darrell Thomas United States
Ralph W. Koenig Germany
Sun Jae Won South Korea
Paola De Franco Italy
Gregor Omejec Slovenia
M. Foschini Italy
Juerd Wijntjes Netherlands
Linda Dvali Canada
Yu‐Ping Shen Taiwan
Thomas Schelle relative to Henrich Kele Germany Henrich Kele's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Henrich Kele · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Schelle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Schelle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Schelle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Schelle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Schelle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Schelle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Schelle. The network helps show where Thomas Schelle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Schelle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Schelle Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Schelle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201489
2 201587
3 201770
4 201634
5 201619
6 20178
7 20217
8 20116
9 20156
10 20205
11 20144
12 20174
13 20183
14 20202
15 20122
16 20111
17 20121
18 20131
19 20151
20 20130

About Thomas Schelle

Thomas Schelle is a scholar working on Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, having authored 20 papers that have together received 350 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Peripheral Nerve Disorders (17 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (13 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (12 papers), Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases (3 papers), Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders (3 papers), Hereditary Neurological Disorders (2 papers), Tendon Structure and Treatment (2 papers) and Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (298 citations), Neurology (96 citations), Surgery (262 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (59 citations) and Rehabilitation (19 citations). Thomas Schelle has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Hungary and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Zsuzsanna Arányi, Josef Böhm, Anita Csillik, Péter Barsi, Dániel Bereczki, Juergen Boehm, Tobias Bäumer, Alexander Münchau, Nicole Muschol and Alexander Grimm. Their work appears in journals such as Muscle & Nerve, Handchirurgie · Mikrochirurgie · Plastische Chirurgie, Hand Clinics, Neurology and Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact