Thomas Scheler

729 citations
12 papers · 574 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Scheler

12 papers receiving 561 citations

Peers

Thomas Scheler
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Geophysics 364
  • Structural Biology 20
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 360
  • Condensed Matter Physics 77
  • Materials Chemistry 299
Replace Dongdong Kang with:
Dongdong Kang China
A. Ehnes Germany
Nicholas Holtgrewe United States
Rachel J. Husband Germany
R. Torchio France
P. Focher Italy
Narayani Choudhury India
Charles Pépin France
Björn Wehinger France
B. Mattern Germany
Thomas Scheler relative to Dongdong Kang China Dongdong Kang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Dongdong Kang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Scheler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Scheler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Scheler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Scheler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Scheler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Scheler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Scheler. The network helps show where Thomas Scheler may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Scheler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Scheler Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Scheler links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2012206
2 201179
3 201367
4 201256
5 201337
6 200932
7 201329
8 201424
9 201116
10 200915
11 201512
12 20081

About Thomas Scheler

Thomas Scheler is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Geophysics, Materials Chemistry, Condensed Matter Physics and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 12 papers that have together received 574 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include High-pressure geophysics and materials (8 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (5 papers), Hydrogen Storage and Materials (4 papers), Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (2 papers), Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (2 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (1 paper) and Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geophysics (364 citations), Structural Biology (20 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (360 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (77 citations) and Materials Chemistry (299 citations). Thomas Scheler has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Eugene Gregoryanz, Christophe L. Guillaume, Ross T. Howie, Alexander F. Goncharov, Miriam Marqués, Olga Degtyareva, John E. Proctor, C. Donnerer, Shaun R. Evans and Zuzana Konôpková. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review B, Physical Review Letters, The Journal of Chemical Physics, Applied Physics Letters and Journal of Physics Condensed Matter.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact