Thomas S. Stroik
Impact in
- Language and Linguistics top 2%
- Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
- Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies
- Linguistics and Language top 10%
- Linguistic Variation and Morphology
Papers in
-
- Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation 8
- Historical Linguistics and Language Studies 1
- Linguistic research and analysis 1
-
- Natural Language Processing Techniques 4
- Co-authors
- Michael T. Putnam (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Linguistic Inquiry (5 papers)Lingua (2 papers)The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique (1 paper)The Linguistic Review (1 paper)Medical Entomology and Zoology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Thomas S. Stroik
15 papers receiving 146 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 24
- Language and Linguistics 190
- Linguistics and Language 40
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 49
- Artificial Intelligence 98
- Cultural Studies 20
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas S. Stroik
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas S. Stroik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas S. Stroik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas S. Stroik more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas S. Stroik
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas S. Stroik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas S. Stroik. The network helps show where Thomas S. Stroik may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside Thomas S. Stroik, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Middles and movement | 1992 | 39 |
| 2 | 2001 | 34 | |
| 3 | Adverbs as V-Sisters | 1990 | 27 |
| 4 | 2009 | 22 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 20 | |
| 6 | 1996 | 17 | |
| 7 | On middle formation: a reply to Zribi-Hertz | 1995 | 14 |
| 8 | 1999 | 14 | |
| 9 | 1992 | 5 | |
| 10 | 1990 | 4 | |
| 11 | 1995 | 3 | |
| 12 | Syntax and ground zero | 2011 | 2 |
| 13 | 2005 | 2 | |
| 14 | Syntax at ground zero | 2011 | 1 |
| 15 | Path theory and argument structure | 1991 | 1 |
About Thomas S. Stroik
Thomas S. Stroik is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Artificial Intelligence, Cultural Studies, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Information Systems, having authored 15 papers that have together received 205 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (8 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (4 papers), Language and cultural evolution (2 papers), Basque language and culture studies (1 paper), Phonetics and Phonology Research (1 paper), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (1 paper), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (1 paper) and Linguistic research and analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (190 citations), Linguistics and Language (40 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (49 citations), Artificial Intelligence (98 citations) and Cultural Studies (20 citations). Thomas S. Stroik has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael T. Putnam. Their work appears in journals such as Linguistic Inquiry, Lingua, The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique, The Linguistic Review and Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.