Thomas Régnier

574 citations
22 papers · 443 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Régnier

21 papers receiving 438 citations

Peers

Thomas Régnier
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 189
  • Global and Planetary Change 197
  • Aquatic Science 66
  • Ecology 178
  • Physiology 28
Replace Megan E. Moore with:
Megan E. Moore United States
Marco Stagioni Italy
Yann Czorlich Norway
Nariaki Inoue Japan
Ryo Ishibashi Japan
Haruka Ito Japan
Leanne M. Currey‐Randall Australia
Fabiola Lafarga‐De la Cruz Mexico
Kylie J. Russell Australia
Anthony S. Overton United States
Thomas Régnier relative to Megan E. Moore United States Megan E. Moore's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Megan E. Moore · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Régnier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Régnier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Régnier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Régnier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Régnier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Régnier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Régnier. The network helps show where Thomas Régnier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Régnier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Régnier Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Régnier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201152
2 200942
3 201842
4 201835
5 200933
6 201931
7 201727
8 201226
9 201626
10 201923
11 201716
12 201215
13 201715
14 201114
15 201811
16 201310
17 202110
18 20247
19 20154
20 20242

About Thomas Régnier

Thomas Régnier is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Aquatic Science and Genetics, having authored 22 papers that have together received 443 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Marine and fisheries research (14 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (11 papers), Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (6 papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (4 papers), Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies (3 papers), Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (3 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (3 papers) and Ichthyology and Marine Biology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (189 citations), Global and Planetary Change (197 citations), Aquatic Science (66 citations), Ecology (178 citations) and Physiology (28 citations). Thomas Régnier has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Fiona M. Gibb, Peter J. Wright, Valérie Bolliet, Jacques Labonne, Philippe Gaudin, Didier Mainard, Florence Fioretti, Sybille Facca, Ernesto Freire and Guy Ladam. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Sea Research, Marine Ecology Progress Series, Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, ICES Journal of Marine Science and Journal of Biomaterials Science Polymer Edition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact