Thomas Reeves

1.0k citations
21 papers · 516 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Reeves

20 papers receiving 502 citations

Peers

Thomas Reeves
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Building and Construction 96
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 217
  • Physiology 159
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 45
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 112
Replace Louise Wells with:
Louise Wells United Kingdom
S. Fenton Canada
Fátima Ceia Portugal
Emanuela Tudorache Romania
R. Peter Lokken United States
Minzhen Wang China
Stephan van Eeden Canada
Luís Rodrigues Portugal
Martina Recalde Spain
Eric M. Ossiander United States
Thomas Reeves relative to Louise Wells United Kingdom Louise Wells's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Louise Wells · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Reeves

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Reeves's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Reeves with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Reeves more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Reeves

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Reeves. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Reeves. The network helps show where Thomas Reeves may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Reeves, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Reeves Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Reeves links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991161
2 201555
3 201953
4 201848
5 201937
6 201227
7 202022
8 201922
9 201719
10 201911
11 201911
12 201211
13 201210
14 20217
15 20197
16 20164
17 20194
18
Modular remediation testing system
20003
19 20193
20 20191

About Thomas Reeves

Thomas Reeves is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Building and Construction, Social Psychology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 21 papers that have together received 516 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (9 papers), Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (8 papers), BIM and Construction Integration (4 papers), Renal and Vascular Pathologies (3 papers), Building Energy and Comfort Optimization (2 papers), Ureteral procedures and complications (2 papers), Sustainable Building Design and Assessment (2 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Building and Construction (96 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (217 citations), Physiology (159 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (45 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (112 citations). Thomas Reeves has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Raja R. A. Issa, Svetlana Olbina, Lonni Schultz, Barbara C. Tilley, John M. Kuder, Bhaskar Somani, Amelia Pietropaolo, Denny Levett, Robert Geraghty and Lily Whitehurst. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Endourology, British Journal of Cancer, Oncogenesis, Buildings and Clinical Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact