Thomas Pugh

1.4k citations
34 papers · 1.2k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Pugh

32 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Thomas Pugh
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 670
  • Inorganic Chemistry 356
  • Biophysics 131
  • Organic Chemistry 503
  • Materials Chemistry 633
Replace Zhanna V. Dobrokhotova with:
Zhanna V. Dobrokhotova Russia
Yvonne Rechkemmer Germany
Sylvain Lecocq France
Chad T. Palumbo United States
Zhao‐Bo Hu China
Alina Dragulescu‐Andrasi United States
Jing‐Wei Dai China
Rodrigo González‐Prieto Spain
Román Andrés Spain
Fumiyasu Iwahori Japan
Thomas Pugh relative to Zhanna V. Dobrokhotova Russia Zhanna V. Dobrokhotova's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Zhanna V. Dobrokhotova · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Pugh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Pugh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Pugh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Pugh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Pugh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Pugh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Pugh. The network helps show where Thomas Pugh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Pugh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Pugh Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Pugh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016161
2 2015124
3 2013111
4 2015101
5 201682
6 201660
7 201557
8 201344
9 201435
10 201633
11 201132
12 201632
13 201525
14 201525
15 201624
16 201322
17 201622
18 201622
19 201119
20 201319

About Thomas Pugh

Thomas Pugh is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Organic Chemistry, Materials Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 34 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetism in coordination complexes (14 papers), Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (10 papers), Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (9 papers), N-Heterocyclic Carbenes in Organic and Inorganic Chemistry (7 papers), Synthesis and characterization of novel inorganic/organometallic compounds (7 papers), Copper Interconnects and Reliability (5 papers), Organic and Molecular Conductors Research (5 papers) and Semiconductor materials and devices (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (670 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (356 citations), Biophysics (131 citations), Organic Chemistry (503 citations) and Materials Chemistry (633 citations). Thomas Pugh has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Finland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard A. Layfield, Nicholas F. Chilton, Benjamin M. Day, Liviu F. Chibotaru, David J. Evans, Veacheslav Vieru, Kuntal Pal, Jani O. Moilanen, Andrew L. Johnson and Liviu Ungur. Their work appears in journals such as Dalton Transactions, Inorganic Chemistry, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Chemical Communications and Chemical Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact