Thomas P. Eiting

28 papers receiving 640 citations

Peers

Thomas P. Eiting
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Sensory Systems 186
  • Paleontology 213
  • Developmental Biology 28
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 251
  • Ecology 239
Replace Abigail Curtis with:
Abigail Curtis United States
Laurel R. Yohe United States
Takushi Kishida Japan
Jeremy R. Corfield Canada
Julie A. Meachen-Samuels United States
Daisuke Koyabu Japan
Jan Šklíba Czechia
Alejandro Rico‐Guevara United States
Evan P. Kingsley United States
Simon Baeckens Belgium
Thomas P. Eiting relative to Abigail Curtis United States Abigail Curtis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Abigail Curtis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas P. Eiting

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas P. Eiting's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas P. Eiting with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas P. Eiting more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas P. Eiting

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas P. Eiting. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas P. Eiting. The network helps show where Thomas P. Eiting may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas P. Eiting, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas P. Eiting Line = papers co-authored together Thomas P. Eiting links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005100
2 200966
3
Species diversity gradients in relation to geological history in North American freshwater fishes
201043
4 201436
5 200735
6 201135
7 201134
8 201431
9 201131
10 202129
11 202226
12 201425
13 201425
14 201123
15 201917
16 200716
17 200915
18 202014
19 201413
20 202110

About Thomas P. Eiting

Thomas P. Eiting is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Ecology and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 29 papers that have together received 650 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (14 papers), Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (11 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (10 papers), Marine animal studies overview (7 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (7 papers), Evolution and Paleontology Studies (5 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (4 papers) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (186 citations), Paleontology (213 citations), Developmental Biology (28 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (251 citations) and Ecology (239 citations). Thomas P. Eiting has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Vietnam. Frequent co-authors include Timothy D. Smith, Gregg F. Gunnell, Elizabeth R. Dumont, Timothy B. Rowe, Thomas E. Macrini, Richard A. Ketcham, Gerald R. Smith, Matt Wachowiak, Blair Perot and Kunwar P. Bhatnagar. Their work appears in journals such as The Anatomical Record, Journal of Mammalian Evolution, Journal of Experimental Biology, eNeuro and SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact