Thomas Österberg

29 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Thomas Österberg
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Pharmaceutical Science 163
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 378
  • Spectroscopy 324
  • Neurology 125
  • Oncology 376
Replace Chris Ho with:
Chris Ho United States
Oksana Tsinman United States
Rajesh K. Singh India
Ka‐Yun Ng United States
Magdalena Markowicz-Piasecka Poland
Francis Müller Switzerland
Minoru Machida Japan
Staffan Tavelin Sweden
Elżbieta Mikiciuk‐Olasik Poland
Masihuz Zaman India
Thomas Österberg relative to Chris Ho United States Chris Ho's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Chris Ho · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Österberg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Österberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Österberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Österberg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Österberg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Österberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Österberg. The network helps show where Thomas Österberg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Österberg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Österberg Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Österberg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004327
2 1998119
3 199789
4 200187
5 201186
6 199884
7 199983
8 200082
9
APPLICATIONS OF SELF-COMPACTING CONCRETE IN JAPAN, EUROPE AND THE UNITED STATES
200370
10 200168
11 200064
12 199759
13 201856
14 200144
15 199739
16 199936
17 201922
18 200016
19 199716
20 200116

About Thomas Österberg

Thomas Österberg is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Spectroscopy, Molecular Biology and Oncology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics (7 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (7 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (6 papers), Conducting polymers and applications (5 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (5 papers), Hemophilia Treatment and Research (4 papers), Protein purification and stability (3 papers) and Thin-Film Transistor Technologies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (163 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (378 citations), Spectroscopy (324 citations), Neurology (125 citations) and Oncology (376 citations). Thomas Österberg has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ulf Norinder, Per Artursson, Marianne Mikaelsson, Per J. R. Sjöberg, Tetsuya Terasaki, Aloı̈se Mabondzo, J. Nilsson, Natalia Borg, Roméo Cecchelli and Roger D. Hurst. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Pharmaceutical Research, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, International Journal of Pharmaceutics and Advanced Functional Materials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact