Thomas Österberg

21 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Thomas Österberg
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Neurology 236
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 467
  • Pharmaceutical Science 162
  • Oncology 144
  • Spectroscopy 87
Replace Oksana Tsinman with:
Oksana Tsinman Hungary
Dharam Veer Kohli India
Tomoyuki Furubayashi Japan
Ruey‐Shiuan Tsai Switzerland
Alex Joseph India
Simon Žakelj Slovenia
Krzysztof Sztanke Poland
Giuseppe Saccomanni Italy
Zdzisław Chilmończyk Poland
Glynn Wilson United States
Thomas Österberg relative to Oksana Tsinman Hungary Oksana Tsinman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
Oksana Tsinman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Österberg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Österberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Österberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Österberg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Österberg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Österberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Österberg. The network helps show where Thomas Österberg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Österberg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Österberg Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Österberg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004338
2 1998117
3 199789
4 201187
5 199886
6 200186
7 199983
8 200081
9 200167
10 200065
11 201857
12 199755
13 202455
14 200144
15 199738
16 199934
17 199716
18 200016
19 200115
20 200115

About Thomas Österberg

Thomas Österberg is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Hematology, Pharmaceutical Science, Food Science and Analytical Chemistry, having authored 21 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (8 papers), Hemophilia Treatment and Research (4 papers), Microencapsulation and Drying Processes (3 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (2 papers), Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (2 papers), Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics (2 papers), Protein purification and stability (2 papers) and Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (236 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (467 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (162 citations), Oncology (144 citations) and Spectroscopy (87 citations). Thomas Österberg has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Japan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ulf Norinder, Per Artursson, Per Lundahl, Marianne Mikaelsson, Per J. R. Sjöberg, Aloïse M Mabondzo, Tuulikki Lindmark, Tetsuya Terasaki, Laurence Fénart and Danica B Stanimirovic. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Pharmaceutical Research, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact