Thomas Nobis

23 papers receiving 760 citations

Peers

Thomas Nobis
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 38
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 233
  • Materials Chemistry 415
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 276
  • Condensed Matter Physics 87
Replace Guillaume Lheureux with:
Guillaume Lheureux France
Sumin Choi Australia
Erik P. A. M. Bakkers Netherlands
Su‐Hyun Gong South Korea
Kasey J. Russell United States
Sebastian Geburt Germany
Chang‐Wei Cheng Taiwan
Sascha Kalusniak Germany
Heng Li Taiwan
Thomas Nobis relative to Guillaume Lheureux France Guillaume Lheureux's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Guillaume Lheureux · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Nobis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Nobis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Nobis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Nobis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Nobis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Nobis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Nobis. The network helps show where Thomas Nobis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Nobis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Nobis Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Nobis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004261
2 200597
3 201072
4 201967
5 200464
6 201035
7 200531
8 200629
9 200726
10 200724
11 200718
12 200517
13 200715
14
Low-order optical whispering-gallery modes in hexagonal nanocavities (11 pages)
20054
15 20154
16 20052
17 20152
18 20072
19 20192
20 20052

About Thomas Nobis

Thomas Nobis is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 26 papers that have together received 778 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include ZnO doping and properties (8 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (8 papers), Ga2O3 and related materials (6 papers), Advanced optical system design (6 papers), Photonic Crystals and Applications (5 papers), Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (4 papers), Optical Coatings and Gratings (4 papers) and Mechanical and Optical Resonators (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Acoustics and Ultrasonics (38 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (233 citations), Materials Chemistry (415 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (276 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (87 citations). Thomas Nobis has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, China and France. Frequent co-authors include Marius Grundmann, Michael Lorenz, A. Rahm, Е. М. Кайдашев, J. Lenzner, Christian Czekalla, G. Zimmermann, Bingqiang Cao, J. Zúñiga‐Pérez and G. Wagner. Their work appears in journals such as Thin Solid Films, Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Superlattices and Microstructures, physica status solidi (b) and Applied Physics A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact