Thomas Meiners

604 citations
28 papers · 426 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Meiners

21 papers receiving 395 citations

Peers

Thomas Meiners
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 110
  • Speech and Hearing 31
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 70
  • Rehabilitation 23
  • Rheumatology 51
Replace Daniel K. Riew with:
Daniel K. Riew United States
Hyun-Yoon Ko South Korea
Hiroaki Kimura Japan
Gregory Nemunaitis United States
In-Sik Lee South Korea
Bart Bartels Netherlands
J Kiwerski Poland
R Brissot France
Tien‐Wen Chen Taiwan
Young Jin Jung South Korea
Thomas Meiners relative to Daniel K. Riew United States Daniel K. Riew's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Daniel K. Riew · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Meiners

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Meiners's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Meiners with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Meiners more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Meiners

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Meiners. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Meiners. The network helps show where Thomas Meiners may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Meiners, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Meiners Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Meiners links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200372
2 199954
3 199752
4 201348
5 201834
6 200330
7 200230
8 201527
9 199926
10 20038
11 20058
12 20036
13 20105
14 20044
15 20034
16 20224
17 20034
18 20213
19 20012
20 20122

About Thomas Meiners

Thomas Meiners is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Rehabilitation, Biomedical Engineering and Occupational Therapy, having authored 28 papers that have together received 426 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (5 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (4 papers), Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (4 papers), Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (3 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (3 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (3 papers) and Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (110 citations), Speech and Hearing (31 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (70 citations), Rehabilitation (23 citations) and Rheumatology (51 citations). Thomas Meiners has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and United States. Frequent co-authors include Rainer Abel, Hans Jürgen Gerner, Volker Böhm, Dietmar Schroeder, Wolfgang H. Krautschneider, Michael Russold, Hans Dietl, Alexander Gail, Klaus‐Peter Hoffmann and Stephanie Westendorff. Their work appears in journals such as Spinal Cord, Journal of Neurotrauma, International Wound Journal, Journal of Neural Engineering and Artificial Organs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact