Thomas Meier

32 papers receiving 285 citations

Peers

Thomas Meier
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • History and Philosophy of Science 26
  • Literature and Literary Theory 48
  • History 34
  • Geophysics 43
  • Space and Planetary Science 4
Replace Bill Marshall with:
Bill Marshall United States
Martin Meisel Germany
Christian Gerlach Germany
Alain France
Michael Brett United Kingdom
Peter Doyle United Kingdom
Pierre Bayle France
Dieter Hoffmann Germany
Martin Munro United States
Peter Schäfer Germany
Thomas Meier relative to Bill Marshall United States Bill Marshall's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Bill Marshall · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Meier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Meier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Meier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Meier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Meier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Meier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Meier. The network helps show where Thomas Meier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Meier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Meier Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Meier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201640
2 201238
3 201434
4 199833
5 198527
6 199723
7 200614
8 201314
9
Defoe and the defense of commerce
198710
10 199510
11 20139
12 20208
13 20118
14 20068
15 20247
16 19987
17 20087
18
Appropriate Narratives: Archaeologists, Publics and Stories
20137
19
Modellierung und Simulation des Elektrolichtbogenofens
20166
20 20086

About Thomas Meier

Thomas Meier is a scholar working on Civil and Structural Engineering, Political Science and International Relations, Literature and Literary Theory, History and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 43 papers that have together received 359 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization (4 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (4 papers), Laser Material Processing Techniques (4 papers), Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques (4 papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (3 papers), Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures (3 papers), American Literature and Culture (3 papers) and Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (26 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (48 citations), History (34 citations), Geophysics (43 citations) and Space and Planetary Science (4 citations). Thomas Meier has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Maximillian E. Novak, Markus Zimmermann, Guido Hennig, B. Jaeggi, Beat Neuenschwander, Theodor M. Fliedner, Christian A. Thomas, Benedikt Ziegler, Robert Müller and U. W. Hunziker. Their work appears in journals such as American Literature, Eighteenth-Century Studies, Acta Geotechnica, International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health and Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact