Thomas M. Large
Impact in
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine top 10%
- Rehabilitation top 10%
Papers in
- Surgery 10
- Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation 3
- Orthopedic Infections and Treatments 3
- Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty 3
- Muscle and Compartmental Disorders 2
- Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes 2
- Hip and Femur Fractures 2
-
- Bone fractures and treatments 9
- Co-authors
- Steven L. Frick (1 shared paper)Julie Agel (1 shared paper)Stephen K. Benirschke (1 shared paper)James C. Krieg (1 shared paper)Peter L. Althausen (1 shared paper)James E. Fleischli (1 shared paper)James F. Kellam (1 shared paper)Stephen H. Sims (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma (3 papers)The Journal of Arthroplasty (1 paper)European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology (1 paper)Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (1 paper)The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Thomas M. Large
11 papers receiving 219 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 57
- Rehabilitation 41
- Surgery 211
- Epidemiology 96
- Equine 2
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas M. Large
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas M. Large's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas M. Large with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas M. Large more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas M. Large
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas M. Large. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas M. Large. The network helps show where Thomas M. Large may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 23 scholars most cited alongside Thomas M. Large, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 52 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 49 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 34 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 29 | |
| 5 | 2003 | 25 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 0 |
About Thomas M. Large
Thomas M. Large is a scholar working on Surgery, Epidemiology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Dermatology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 223 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bone fractures and treatments (9 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (3 papers), Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (3 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (3 papers), Muscle and Compartmental Disorders (2 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (2 papers), Hip and Femur Fractures (2 papers) and Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (57 citations), Rehabilitation (41 citations), Surgery (211 citations), Epidemiology (96 citations) and Equine (2 citations). Thomas M. Large has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Steven L. Frick, Julie Agel, Stephen K. Benirschke, James C. Krieg, Peter L. Althausen, James E. Fleischli, James F. Kellam, Stephen H. Sims, Richard D. Peindl and Michael J. Bosse. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, The Journal of Arthroplasty, European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.