Thomas Loeb
Impact in
- Emergency Medicine top 5%
- Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
- Emergency and Acute Care Studies
-
- Disaster Response and Management
Papers in
-
- Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation 14
- HIV-related health complications and treatments 1
-
- Data-Driven Disease Surveillance 1
- Co-authors
- Daniel Jost (11 shared papers)Frédéric Adnet (7 shared papers)Wulfran Bougouin (8 shared papers)Éric Lecarpentier (8 shared papers)Lionel Lamhaut (6 shared papers)Alain Cariou (7 shared papers)Michel Baer (8 shared papers)Florence Dumas (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- Circulation (4 papers)Resuscitation (3 papers)Comptes Rendus Mathématique (1 paper)Heart (1 paper)Frontiers in Public Health (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Thomas Loeb
19 papers receiving 152 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Emergency Medicine 101
- Emergency Medical Services 12
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 18
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 3
- Modeling and Simulation 3
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Loeb
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Loeb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Loeb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Loeb more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Loeb
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Loeb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Loeb. The network helps show where Thomas Loeb may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Loeb, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 31 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 26 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 14 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 12 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 11 | |
| 7 | 1986 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2025 | 0 |
About Thomas Loeb
Thomas Loeb is a scholar working on Emergency Medicine, Epidemiology, Emergency Medical Services, Sociology and Political Science and Molecular Biology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 156 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (14 papers), Disaster Response and Management (3 papers), Transportation and Mobility Innovations (1 paper), Data-Driven Disease Surveillance (1 paper), Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (1 paper), HIV-related health complications and treatments (1 paper), COVID-19 epidemiological studies (1 paper) and Disaster Management and Resilience (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (101 citations), Emergency Medical Services (12 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (18 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (3 citations) and Modeling and Simulation (3 citations). Thomas Loeb has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Jost, Frédéric Adnet, Wulfran Bougouin, Éric Lecarpentier, Lionel Lamhaut, Alain Cariou, Michel Baer, Florence Dumas, Xavier Jouven and Éloi Marijon. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, Resuscitation, Comptes Rendus Mathématique, Heart and Frontiers in Public Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.