Thomas Lawson

18 papers receiving 188 citations

Peers

Thomas Lawson
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Family Practice 13
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 21
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 5
  • Nephrology 23
  • Hepatology 25
Replace Daniel King with:
Daniel King Israel
Melissa A. Minor United States
Carlo Descovich Italy
Shahab Bozorgmehri United States
Andrew Batchelder United Kingdom
M.S. Holanda Peña Spain
Molly S. Brett United States
Jorge Brieva Australia
Elizabeth Walters United States
Jennifer A. Oman United States
Thomas Lawson relative to Daniel King Israel Daniel King's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×12.5×
Daniel King · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Lawson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Lawson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Lawson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Lawson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Lawson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Lawson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Lawson. The network helps show where Thomas Lawson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Lawson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Lawson Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Lawson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198145
2 199136
3 200617
4 199415
5 202015
6 202215
7 201813
8 199810
9 20189
10 20169
11 19825
12 19765
13 20194
14 19973
15 20182
16 20152
17 19982
18 20201
19 20031
20 20180

About Thomas Lawson

Thomas Lawson is a scholar working on Neurology, Emergency Medical Services, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 22 papers that have together received 209 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (4 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (3 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (2 papers), Vascular Procedures and Complications (2 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (2 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (2 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (2 papers) and Complex Systems and Decision Making (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (13 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (21 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (5 citations), Nephrology (23 citations) and Hepatology (25 citations). Thomas Lawson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Bangladesh. Frequent co-authors include Lawrence M. Ryan, Franklin Kozin, Guillermo F. Carrera, Michele C. Balas, Molly McNett, W. Dennis Foley, Susan Yeager, S J Erickson, Michael E. Bernardino and J. Bruce Kneeland. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Critical Care, Seminars in Liver Disease, The Neurologist, Critical Care Nurse and Journal of Neuroscience Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact