Thomas L. Schmidt

3.4k citations
120 papers · 2.5k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas L. Schmidt

112 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Thomas L. Schmidt
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.9k
  • Condensed Matter Physics 638
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 243
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 84
  • Rehabilitation 65
Replace K. Furuya with:
K. Furuya Brazil
Brian K. Jones United Kingdom
Matthias J. Graf United States
Haim Taitelbaum Israel
Bernhard Hensel Germany
Florian J. W. Lang Germany
Shumpei Mori Japan
Archie M Campbell United Kingdom
Alex L. Sukstanskii Ukraine
Alain Barthélémy France
Thomas L. Schmidt relative to K. Furuya Brazil K. Furuya's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.8×
K. Furuya · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas L. Schmidt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas L. Schmidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas L. Schmidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas L. Schmidt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas L. Schmidt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas L. Schmidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas L. Schmidt. The network helps show where Thomas L. Schmidt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas L. Schmidt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas L. Schmidt Line = papers co-authored together Thomas L. Schmidt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 120 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012357
2 2012173
3 2008105
4 201580
5 201980
6 200976
7 201869
8 198262
9 199858
10 199155
11 201050
12 201150
13 200146
14 201046
15 201141
16 201340
17 201639
18 199937
19 201337
20 199836

About Thomas L. Schmidt

Thomas L. Schmidt is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics, Materials Chemistry, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Epidemiology, having authored 120 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum and electron transport phenomena (52 papers), Topological Materials and Phenomena (44 papers), Quantum many-body systems (21 papers), Graphene research and applications (20 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (18 papers), Bone fractures and treatments (12 papers), Hip disorders and treatments (10 papers) and Mechanical and Optical Resonators (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.9k citations), Condensed Matter Physics (638 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (243 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (84 citations) and Rehabilitation (65 citations). Thomas L. Schmidt has collaborated with scholars based in Luxembourg, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Adilet Imambekov, Leonid Glazman, A. Komnik, Rakesh P. Tiwari, Stephan Rachel, Tobias Meng, Christoph Bruder, Felix von Oppen, Leonid I. Glazman and Dennis S. Weiner. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. B., Physical Review B, Physical Review Letters, Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics and Physical Review Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact