Thomas L. Bollen
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Marc G. Besselink (53 shared papers)Hjalmar C. van Santvoort (46 shared papers)Hein G. Gooszen (30 shared papers)Olaf J. Bakker (20 shared papers)Bert van Ramshorst (13 shared papers)Marja A. Boermeester (13 shared papers)Karen D. Horvath (7 shared papers)Casper H.J. van Eijck (15 shared papers)
- Journals
- Pancreatology (9 papers)Pancreas (9 papers)HPB (5 papers)British journal of surgery (5 papers)Annals of Surgery (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Thomas L. Bollen
62 papers receiving 3.3k citations
Thomas L. Bollen's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Surgery 2.9k
- Oncology 1.2k
- Emergency Medicine 233
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 566
- Dermatology 73
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas L. Bollen
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas L. Bollen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas L. Bollen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas L. Bollen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas L. Bollen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas L. Bollen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas L. Bollen. The network helps show where Thomas L. Bollen may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas L. Bollen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Endoscopic Transgastric vs Surgical Necrosectomy for Infected Necrotizing Pancreatitis Hit paper breakdown → | 2012 | 472 |
| 2 | Impact of characteristics of organ failure and infected necrosis on mortality in necrotising pancreatitis Hit paper breakdown → | 2018 | 286 |
| 3 | 2012 | 269 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 244 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 194 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 183 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 178 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 113 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 94 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 94 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 84 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 83 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 79 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 79 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 75 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 61 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 61 | |
| 18 | 2007 | 53 | |
| 19 | 2007 | 53 | |
| 20 | 2012 | 50 |
About Thomas L. Bollen
Thomas L. Bollen is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology, Emergency Medicine, Infectious Diseases and Dermatology, having authored 67 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (51 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (14 papers), Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments (7 papers), Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management (5 papers), Dermatological and COVID-19 studies (3 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (3 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers) and Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (2.9k citations), Oncology (1.2k citations), Emergency Medicine (233 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (566 citations) and Dermatology (73 citations). Thomas L. Bollen has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Marc G. Besselink, Hjalmar C. van Santvoort, Hein G. Gooszen, Olaf J. Bakker, Bert van Ramshorst, Marja A. Boermeester, Karen D. Horvath, Casper H.J. van Eijck, Usama Ahmed Ali and Mark C. van Baal. Their work appears in journals such as Pancreatology, Pancreas, HPB, British journal of surgery and Annals of Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.