Thomas Koprek

523 citations
10 papers · 392 · h-index 10

Impact in

    • Transgenic Plants and Applications
    • Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
    • Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies
    • Plant Virus Research Studies
    • Genetically Modified Organisms Research
    • Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology

Papers in

    • Plant tissue culture and regeneration 9
    • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 3
    • Plant Virus Research Studies 3
    • Chromosomal and Genetic Variations 3
    • Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies 3
    • Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology 1

Thomas Koprek

10 papers receiving 355 citations

Peers

Thomas Koprek
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • Biotechnology 170
  • Plant Science 324
  • Molecular Biology 330
  • Horticulture 1
  • Genetics 22
Replace W. L. Petersen with:
W. L. Petersen United States
Shingo Nagaya Japan
C. O. Rathus Australia
Pritilata Nayak India
Sung-Hoon Jun South Korea
F. van der Mark Netherlands
M.-J. Cho United States
D. J. Merlo United States
Takashi Hagio Japan
Gynheung An United States
Thomas Koprek relative to W. L. Petersen United States W. L. Petersen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
W. L. Petersen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Koprek

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Koprek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Koprek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Koprek more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Koprek

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Koprek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Koprek. The network helps show where Thomas Koprek may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Koprek, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Koprek Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Koprek links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 199988
2 200163
3 200056
4 199646
5 199935
6 199529
7 200624
8 199522
9 200620
10 19969

About Thomas Koprek

Thomas Koprek is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Biotechnology, Physiology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 10 papers that have together received 392 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant tissue culture and regeneration (9 papers), Transgenic Plants and Applications (5 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (3 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (3 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (3 papers), Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies (3 papers), Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology (1 paper) and Microbial Inactivation Methods (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (170 citations), Plant Science (324 citations), Molecular Biology (330 citations), Horticulture (1 citation) and Genetics (22 citations). Thomas Koprek has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Peggy G. Lemaux, Jeanine Louwerse, Rosalind Williams‐Carrier, David McElroy, Jutta Schulze, Robert Hänsch, Ralf R. Mendel, M.-J. Cho, S. Zhang and Phil Bregitzer. Their work appears in journals such as The Plant Journal, Plant Science, Genetica, Plant Cell Reports and PLANT PHYSIOLOGY.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact