Thomas Juster

538 citations
9 papers · 276 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Juster

8 papers receiving 199 citations

Peers

Thomas Juster
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 137
  • Economics and Econometrics 184
  • Public Administration 12
  • Finance 29
  • Accounting 21
Replace Martin Bronfenbrenner with:
Martin Bronfenbrenner United Kingdom
Bob Hamilton Canada
Alfonso Arpaia Belgium
Joan Robinson United Kingdom
J. W. Nevile Australia
Luigi Bonatti Italy
Jaakko Kiander Finland
Ramón Gómez Salvador Germany
Tom Valentine Australia
Howard M. Wachtel United States
Thomas Juster relative to Martin Bronfenbrenner United Kingdom Martin Bronfenbrenner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Martin Bronfenbrenner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Juster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Juster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Juster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Juster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Juster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Juster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Juster. The network helps show where Thomas Juster may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Juster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Juster Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Juster links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 197184
2 197874
3 200251
4 197732
5 198030
6 20202
7 19872
8
The Positive Economics of Methodology
19891
9
A Framework for Measuring Performance
19730

About Thomas Juster

Thomas Juster is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, History and Philosophy of Science, Sociology and Political Science and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 9 papers that have together received 276 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence (1 paper), Economic Theory and Institutions (1 paper), Philosophy and History of Science (1 paper), Nuclear Issues and Defense (1 paper), Economic Theory and Policy (1 paper), Disaster Management and Resilience (1 paper), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (1 paper) and Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (137 citations), Economics and Econometrics (184 citations), Public Administration (12 citations), Finance (29 citations) and Accounting (21 citations). Thomas Juster has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robert J. Gordon, William C. Brainard, Robert E. Hall, John B. Shoven, Frederic S. Mishkin, Michael C. Lovell, Benjamin M. Friedman, George L. W. Perry, James Tobin and James S. Duesenberry. Their work appears in journals such as Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, PS Political Science & Politics, SSRN Electronic Journal and NBER Chapters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact