Thomas Junk

1.1k citations
52 papers · 884 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

    • Organic Chemistry Cycloaddition Reactions 11
    • Structural and Chemical Analysis of Organic and Inorganic Compounds 8
    • Organoselenium and organotellurium chemistry 22

Thomas Junk

52 papers receiving 865 citations

Peers

Thomas Junk
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Pharmaceutical Science 289
  • Toxicology 105
  • Inorganic Chemistry 297
  • Organic Chemistry 286
  • Catalysis 55
Replace Fang Yang with:
Fang Yang China
Reijo Suontamo Finland
Ruggero Curci Italy
Оleg I. Аrtyushin Russia
Dorothy Z. Denney United States
Stella Chapelle France
John Milne Canada
Bing Xu China
Shinzi Kato Japan
H. J. Emeléus United States
Thomas Junk relative to Fang Yang China Fang Yang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
Fang Yang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Junk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Junk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Junk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Junk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Junk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Junk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Junk. The network helps show where Thomas Junk may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Junk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Junk Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Junk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997257
2 200276
3 199658
4 201641
5 201439
6 198738
7 201534
8 199730
9 199529
10 199724
11 198821
12 200916
13 201314
14 201914
15 200513
16 201613
17 198813
18 199012
19 200211
20 200510

About Thomas Junk

Thomas Junk is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Toxicology, Spectroscopy, Inorganic Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Science, having authored 52 papers that have together received 884 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organoselenium and organotellurium chemistry (22 papers), Organic Chemistry Cycloaddition Reactions (11 papers), Structural and Chemical Analysis of Organic and Inorganic Compounds (8 papers), Chemical Reactions and Isotopes (8 papers), Crystal structures of chemical compounds (7 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Metal complexes synthesis and properties (6 papers) and Magnetism in coordination complexes (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (289 citations), Toxicology (105 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (297 citations), Organic Chemistry (286 citations) and Catalysis (55 citations). Thomas Junk has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Austria and Italy. Frequent co-authors include W. James Catallo, Kurt J. Irgolic, Frank R. Fronczek, Franz A. Mautner, Salah S. Massoud, Zdeněk Trávnı́ček, Roland C. Fischer, Radovan Herchel, Giuseppe Pappalardo and José Elguero. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Crystallographica Section C Crystal Structure Communications, Tetrahedron Letters, Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, Waste Management and Journal of Environmental Quality.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact