Thomas Jack

46 papers receiving 944 citations

Peers

Thomas Jack
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Health Informatics 32
  • Family Practice 32
  • Health Information Management 50
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 20
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 138
Replace Sang Eun Lee with:
Sang Eun Lee South Korea
Arjun Sinha United States
Partha Sardar United States
Dong Heon Yang South Korea
Pedro Ponce Germany
Nariman Nezami United States
Barbara G. Delano United States
Kueiyu Joshua Lin United States
Arnaud D. Kazé United States
Michael P. Cornes United Kingdom
Thomas Jack relative to Sang Eun Lee South Korea Sang Eun Lee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Sang Eun Lee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Jack

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Jack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Jack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Jack more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Jack

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Jack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Jack. The network helps show where Thomas Jack may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Jack, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Jack Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Jack links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197596
2 200793
3 201280
4 201271
5 201864
6 201656
7 201048
8 201248
9 201847
10 201341
11 200333
12 201933
13 197932
14 201531
15 201022
16 201519
17 197917
18 199117
19 202113
20
Long-term efficacy of surgical cordotomy in intractable non-malignant pain.
198312

About Thomas Jack

Thomas Jack is a scholar working on Surgery, Epidemiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Biomedical Engineering and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 51 papers that have together received 986 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (17 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (7 papers), Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (6 papers), Acute Kidney Injury Research (5 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (4 papers), Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments (4 papers), Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring (4 papers) and Electronic Health Records Systems (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (32 citations), Family Practice (32 citations), Health Information Management (50 citations), Complementary and Manual Therapy (20 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (138 citations). Thomas Jack has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Michael Sasse, Martin Boehne, Allan Campbell, Ewan Cameron, Philipp Beerbaum, Michael Marschollek, Harald Bertram, Armin Wessel, H Köditz and Bernadette Brent. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Pediatrics, Methods of Information in Medicine, European Heart Journal, Intensive Care Medicine and Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact