Thomas Jack

46 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Thomas Jack
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Health Informatics 23
  • Transplantation 22
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 133
  • Oncology 189
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 124
Replace Matthew Gitlin with:
Matthew Gitlin United States
Nariman Nezami United States
M.G.S. Shashaty United States
Müntzer Mughal United Kingdom
Ashish Verma United States
Ram Subramanian United States
Brett E. Fortune United States
Rajit K. Basu United States
Jordan Li Australia
Rosa Ramos Spain
Thomas Jack relative to Matthew Gitlin United States Matthew Gitlin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Matthew Gitlin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Jack

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Jack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Jack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Jack more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Jack

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Jack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Jack. The network helps show where Thomas Jack may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Jack, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Jack Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Jack links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007109
2 1975104
3 201285
4 201274
5 201872
6 201658
7 201853
8 201252
9 201048
10 201342
11 201937
12 200336
13 201533
14 197932
15 201024
16 201523
17 197918
18 202113
19 202112
20 202012

About Thomas Jack

Thomas Jack is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Oncology, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (11 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (5 papers), Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (4 papers), Machine Learning in Healthcare (2 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (2 papers), Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments (2 papers), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (2 papers) and Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (23 citations), Transplantation (22 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (133 citations), Oncology (189 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (124 citations). Thomas Jack has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Michael Sasse, Martin Boehne, Allan Campbell, Ewan Cameron, Philipp Beerbaum, Michael Marschollek, Harald Bertram, Armin Wessel, H Köditz and André Karch. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Pediatrics, Pediatric Transplantation, Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, Intensive Care Medicine and Methods of Information in Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact