Thomas Hübner

1.5k citations
6 papers · 174 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Hübner

6 papers receiving 170 citations

Peers

Thomas Hübner
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • General Decision Sciences 20
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 127
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 66
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 50
  • Applied Psychology 16
Replace Masanori Isobe with:
Masanori Isobe Japan
Carsten Bundt Belgium
Adam C. Savine United States
Monja Hoven Netherlands
Belel Ait Oumeziane United States
Janet Shan Canada
Sonia Allain France
Nina Thigpen United States
Patrycja Kałamała Poland
Aquiles Luna‐Rodriguez Germany
Thomas Hübner relative to Masanori Isobe Japan Masanori Isobe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Masanori Isobe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Hübner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Hübner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Hübner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Hübner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Hübner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Hübner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Hübner. The network helps show where Thomas Hübner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Hübner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Hübner Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Hübner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
#Work
1 200962
2 201250
3 201424
4 201415
5 201414
6 20199

About Thomas Hübner

Thomas Hübner is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 6 papers that have together received 174 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (1 paper), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (1 paper), Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (1 paper), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (1 paper) and Children's Physical and Motor Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (20 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (127 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (66 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (50 citations) and Applied Psychology (16 citations). Thomas Hübner has collaborated with scholars based in Germany. Frequent co-authors include Michael N. Smolka, Stephan Ripke, Eva Mennigen, Kathrin Müller, Sarah Rodehacke, Dirk Schmidt, Kerstin Konrad, Tilo Kircher, Ivo Marx and Sabine C. Herpertz. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, Brain Research and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact