Thomas Holzmann

38 papers receiving 704 citations

Peers

Thomas Holzmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
  • Endocrinology 50
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 64
  • Infectious Diseases 154
  • Business and International Management 17
  • Strategy and Management 106
Replace John R. Hamilton with:
John R. Hamilton United States
Michael R. Ford United States
Priya Gupta India
June Wang Hong Kong
Aditya Kumar Sharma United States
Sonal Thukral India
Katarzyna Dziewanowska Poland
Tomasz Mroczkowski United States
Chien-Chang Yang Taiwan
Ben Stephenson Canada
Thomas Holzmann relative to John R. Hamilton United States John R. Hamilton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
John R. Hamilton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Holzmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Holzmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Holzmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Holzmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Holzmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Holzmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Holzmann. The network helps show where Thomas Holzmann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Holzmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Holzmann Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Holzmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020131
2 2013107
3 201246
4 201443
5 202140
6 201338
7 201334
8 201130
9 201727
10 201824
11 201421
12 201220
13 201220
14 201820
15 202114
16 201212
17 202112
18 202110
19
Plane-based Surface Regularization for Urban 3D Reconstruction
20179
20 20248

About Thomas Holzmann

Thomas Holzmann is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Molecular Biology, Strategy and Management, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Epidemiology, having authored 41 papers that have together received 729 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (4 papers), Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research (4 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (4 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (3 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (3 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (3 papers), Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (3 papers) and Digital Platforms and Economics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (50 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (64 citations), Infectious Diseases (154 citations), Business and International Management (17 citations) and Strategy and Management (106 citations). Thomas Holzmann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Bernhard Katzy, Klaus Sailer, Wulf Schneider‐Brachert, Bernd Salzberger, Florian Hitzenbichler, Frank Hanses, Boris Ehrenstein, Bárbara Schmidt, Felix Buder and Benedikt Lampl. Their work appears in journals such as Emerging infectious diseases, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, PLoS ONE, Infection and Journal of Bacteriology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact