Thomas Helmuth

1.5k citations
61 papers · 1.1k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Helmuth

58 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Thomas Helmuth
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Artificial Intelligence 985
  • Computer Science Applications 130
  • Software 76
  • Molecular Biology 368
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 87
Replace Michael G. Main with:
Michael G. Main United States
Szymon Wąsik Poland
Nadarajen Veerapen United Kingdom
Abdullah N. Arslan United States
Dominik Sobania Germany
Tom Christiansen Australia
Morgan Magnin France
Saemundur Oskar Haraldsson United Kingdom
Carlos R. Rivero United States
Mingzhe Du Taiwan
Thomas Helmuth relative to Michael G. Main United States Michael G. Main's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×19.6×
Michael G. Main · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Helmuth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Helmuth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Helmuth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Helmuth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Helmuth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Helmuth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Helmuth. The network helps show where Thomas Helmuth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Helmuth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Helmuth Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Helmuth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015152
2 2015134
3 201870
4 201851
5 201650
6 201747
7 202141
8 201131
9 201630
10 201627
11 201526
12 202024
13 202022
14 201519
15 202218
16 201818
17 202018
18 201918
19 201417
20 201614

About Thomas Helmuth

Thomas Helmuth is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science Applications, Molecular Biology, Software and Genetics, having authored 61 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications (59 papers), Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research (49 papers), Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects (16 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (9 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (9 papers), Reinforcement Learning in Robotics (9 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (8 papers) and Machine Learning in Bioinformatics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Artificial Intelligence (985 citations), Computer Science Applications (130 citations), Software (76 citations), Molecular Biology (368 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (87 citations). Thomas Helmuth has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Lee C. Spector, Nicholas Freitag McPhee, James E. Matheson, William La Cava, Peter Kelly, Jason H. Moore, Kyle Harrington, Brian Martin, Paweł Liskowski and Krzysztof Krawiec. Their work appears in journals such as Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines, Evolutionary Computation, Artificial Life, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation and Lecture notes in computer science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact