Thomas Heams

457 citations
12 papers · 304 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

    • Gene Regulatory Network Analysis 4
    • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation 2
    • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 2
    • Evolution and Genetic Dynamics 3
    • Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting 2

Thomas Heams

11 papers receiving 293 citations

Peers

Thomas Heams
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 71
  • Genetics 100
  • History and Philosophy of Science 13
  • Reproductive Medicine 20
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 64
Replace Clara Pinto‐Correia with:
Clara Pinto‐Correia United States
Yongsheng Liu China
Pierre Boyer Poland
Jean S. Medawar United States
A. Roche Spain
Cameron D. Palmer United States
Caoyi Chen China
Michael C. Turchin United States
Erin E. Dymek United States
Lesley Paterson United Kingdom
Thomas Heams relative to Clara Pinto‐Correia United States Clara Pinto‐Correia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.5×
Clara Pinto‐Correia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Heams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Heams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Heams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Heams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Heams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Heams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Heams. The network helps show where Thomas Heams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Heams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Heams Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Heams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 200590
2 200370
3 201465
4 200624
5 201419
6 201216
7 20037
8 20115
9 20214
10 20113
11 20151
12 20110

About Thomas Heams

Thomas Heams is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, History and Philosophy of Science and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 12 papers that have together received 304 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Origins and Evolution of Life (4 papers), Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (4 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (3 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (2 papers), Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting (2 papers), Evolution and Science Education (2 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (2 papers) and Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (71 citations), Genetics (100 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (13 citations), Reproductive Medicine (20 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (64 citations). Thomas Heams has collaborated with scholars based in France, Morocco and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Andràs Páldi, Antoine Kerjean, Jean-Jacques Kupiec, Guillaume Lecointre, Philippe Huneman, Takuya Imamura, Pierre Jouannet, Philippe Couvert, Catherine Poirot and Céline Chalas. Their work appears in journals such as Life, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics, European Journal of Human Genetics and BioTechniques.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact