Thomas H. Baum

42 papers receiving 963 citations

Peers

Thomas H. Baum
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 359
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 84
  • Catalysis 77
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 502
  • Inorganic Chemistry 115
Replace P.A.W. van der Heide with:
P.A.W. van der Heide United States
H. Roulet France
Peter Hahn Germany
Masao Takahashi Japan
Joseph Eng United States
Yong Han United States
K. T. Queeney United States
M. C. Wood United States
Sergey A. Krasnikov Ireland
S. Rushworth United Kingdom
Thomas H. Baum relative to P.A.W. van der Heide United States P.A.W. van der Heide's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
P.A.W. van der Heide · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas H. Baum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas H. Baum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas H. Baum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas H. Baum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas H. Baum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas H. Baum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas H. Baum. The network helps show where Thomas H. Baum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas H. Baum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas H. Baum Line = papers co-authored together Thomas H. Baum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199195
2 198580
3 199469
4 199258
5 198957
6 198650
7 198747
8 198744
9 199243
10 200934
11 199334
12 199833
13 199633
14 198631
15 199225
16 198723
17 199623
18 198819
19 200618
20 199917

About Thomas H. Baum

Thomas H. Baum is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 43 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Semiconductor materials and devices (18 papers), Copper Interconnects and Reliability (11 papers), Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques (5 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (5 papers), Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques (5 papers), Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (5 papers), Metal and Thin Film Mechanics (4 papers) and Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (359 citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (84 citations), Catalysis (77 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (502 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (115 citations). Thomas H. Baum has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and France. Frequent co-authors include Carl E. Larson, Carol R. Jones, P. Doppelt, Paul B. Comita, Robert L. Jackson, Chongying Xu, Arnold L. Rheingold, Toivo T. Kodas, Scott Reynolds and Phillip J. Brock. Their work appears in journals such as Chemistry of Materials, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, Applied Physics Letters, Inorganic Chemistry and Journal of Organometallic Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact