Thomas Green

35 papers receiving 237 citations

Peers

Thomas Green
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Linguistics and Language 30
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 51
  • Literature and Literary Theory 39
  • Gender Studies 29
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 19
Replace Joanna Kopaczyk with:
Joanna Kopaczyk United Kingdom
Ramly Hasan Malaysia
Jill Burton Australia
Jos Feys Belgium
David W. Samuels United States
Joshua Trey Barnett United States
Ana María Agudelo Ochoa Colombia
Steven Roger Fischer United States
Wojciech Małecki Poland
Jan Tent Australia
Thomas Green relative to Joanna Kopaczyk United Kingdom Joanna Kopaczyk's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Joanna Kopaczyk · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Green

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Green's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Green with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Green more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Green

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Green. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Green. The network helps show where Thomas Green may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Green, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Green Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Green links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199541
2 198931
3 201627
4 201424
5 202023
6 201322
7
Materialism and the Tendency to Worship Celebrities
201421
8 199514
9 201710
10 20218
11 19698
12 19867
13
Use of the Army Dental Command Corporate Dental Application as an electronic dental record in the Iraq theater of operations.
20116
14 20075
15 19854
16 20194
17 20223
18 20173
19 19913
20 20073

About Thomas Green

Thomas Green is a scholar working on Plant Science, Surgery, History, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 40 papers that have together received 292 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (3 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (3 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (3 papers), Medieval Literature and History (2 papers), Nematode management and characterization studies (2 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (2 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (2 papers) and Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (30 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (51 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (39 citations), Gender Studies (29 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (19 citations). Thomas Green has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Michael Kenstowicz, Gary Watson, Jonathan Hind, Jeanne L. Edman, Lynn E. McCutcheon, Mara S. Aruguete, James D. Griffith, Jason Moran, Rodrigo Ramírez‐Campillo and Benjamin Drury. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal on Addictions, Implicit Religion, The American Journal of Medicine, Pediatric Transplantation and Harvard Educational Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact