Thomas Göttert

463 citations
24 papers · 331 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Göttert

24 papers receiving 321 citations

Peers

Thomas Göttert
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Ecological Modeling 39
  • Ecology 192
  • Developmental Biology 15
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 79
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 58
Replace Rocío A. Pozo with:
Rocío A. Pozo United Kingdom
Bibhuti P. Lahkar India
Alexander K. Killion United States
Sébastien Le Bel France
Andrew Dunn United States
W. Andrew Taylor South Africa
Shigeyuki Izumiyama Japan
Saw Htun Myanmar
Colin Bonnington United Kingdom
Michael O’Neal Campbell Canada
Thomas Göttert relative to Rocío A. Pozo United Kingdom Rocío A. Pozo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Rocío A. Pozo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Göttert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Göttert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Göttert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Göttert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Göttert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Göttert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Göttert. The network helps show where Thomas Göttert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Göttert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Göttert Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Göttert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202071
2 201737
3 201927
4 201926
5 201025
6 201925
7 201719
8 201912
9 202311
10 202010
11 202210
12 20218
13 20157
14 20207
15 20216
16 20206
17 20215
18 20154
19 20224
20 20224

About Thomas Göttert

Thomas Göttert is a scholar working on Ecology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 24 papers that have together received 331 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (14 papers), Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (5 papers), Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (5 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (4 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (4 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (3 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (3 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (39 citations), Ecology (192 citations), Developmental Biology (15 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (79 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (58 citations). Thomas Göttert has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Mozambique and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ulrich Zeller, Carsten Mann, Lelani Mannetti, Karen J. Esler, Gad Perry, J. Keith Hodges, Michiel R. de Boer, Dietmar Zinner, Emanuel Heitlinger and Valério A. Macandza. Their work appears in journals such as Diversity, Global Ecology and Conservation, Scientific Reports, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution and Animals.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact