Thomas Genet

627 citations
13 papers · 70 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Genet

12 papers receiving 65 citations

Peers

Thomas Genet
Comparison fields: 5 of 18
  • Software 17
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 48
  • Artificial Intelligence 55
  • Computer Networks and Communications 16
  • Information Systems 15
Replace Jeroen J. A. Keiren with:
Jeroen J. A. Keiren Netherlands
Anders B. Sandholm Denmark
Douglas R. Smith United Kingdom
François Bobot France
Damien Pous France
Yoad Lustig United States
Jens Chr. Godskesen Denmark
Andrea Turrini China
Femke van Raamsdonk Netherlands
Joe Hurd United Kingdom
Thomas Genet relative to Jeroen J. A. Keiren Netherlands Jeroen J. A. Keiren's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Jeroen J. A. Keiren · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Genet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Genet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Genet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Genet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Genet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Genet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Genet. The network helps show where Thomas Genet may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Genet, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Genet Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Genet links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 200434
2 20209
3 20107
4 20036
5 20084
6 20153
7 20042
8
Verifying Temporal Regular properties of Abstractions of Term Rewriting Systems
20091
9 20171
10
Decidable Approximations of Sets of Descendants and Sets of Normal Forms - extended version -
19971
11
Proving Negative Conjectures on Equational Theories using Induction and Abstract Interpretation
20021
12 20201
13
Rewriting for Cryptographic Protocol Verification - Extended Version -
20000

About Thomas Genet

Thomas Genet is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Information Systems, Software and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 13 papers that have together received 70 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, programming, and type systems (9 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (9 papers), Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (3 papers), Advanced Authentication Protocols Security (2 papers), Software Engineering Research (2 papers), Cryptography and Data Security (2 papers), Security and Verification in Computing (2 papers) and User Authentication and Security Systems (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (17 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (48 citations), Artificial Intelligence (55 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (16 citations) and Information Systems (15 citations). Thomas Genet has collaborated with scholars based in France and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Vlad Rusu, Yann Salmon, Thomas Wiben Jensen, Olivier Heen and David Pichardie. Their work appears in journals such as Logical Methods in Computer Science, Journal of Automated Reasoning, Journal of Logical and Algebraic Methods in Programming, Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages and Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact