Thomas Gebert

624 citations
20 papers · 490 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Gebert

17 papers receiving 471 citations

Peers

Thomas Gebert
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 285
  • Condensed Matter Physics 49
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 211
  • Radiation 29
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 33
Replace W. Kuehn with:
W. Kuehn Germany
Scott Wandel United States
Ivan Vasil'evskii Russia
Vladimir Antonov Russia
Yanchun Yin United States
A. Al-Shemmary Germany
Xiaofang Wang China
D. Golde Germany
J. Yamazaki Japan
Kai Bagschik Germany
Thomas Gebert relative to W. Kuehn Germany W. Kuehn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.1×
W. Kuehn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Gebert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Gebert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Gebert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Gebert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Gebert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Gebert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Gebert. The network helps show where Thomas Gebert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Gebert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Gebert Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Gebert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2009247
2 2016125
3 202432
4 201217
5 201415
6 201511
7 202411
8 20208
9 20165
10
Hybrid CO2-Ti:sapphire laser with tunable pulse duration for mid-infrared-pump terahertz-probe spectroscopy
20214
11 20224
12 20213
13 20253
14 20171
15 20231
16 20241
17 20241
18 20241
19 20210
20 20240

About Thomas Gebert

Thomas Gebert is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Radiation and Spectroscopy, having authored 20 papers that have together received 490 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (12 papers), Terahertz technology and applications (6 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (2 papers), Insurance and Financial Risk Management (1 paper), Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides (1 paper), Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics (1 paper), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (1 paper) and Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (285 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (49 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (211 citations), Radiation (29 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (33 citations). Thomas Gebert has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Marek Wieland, Markus Drescher, Maria Krikunova, M. Först, Roland Kalms, Oliver R. Grimm, H. Bromberger, Elke Plönjes, Michael Gensch and B. Liu. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Photonics, Optics Letters, Physical Review A, Nature Communications and Optics Express.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact