Thomas Frank

5.0k citations
101 papers · 2.9k · h-index 30

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Frank

94 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Thomas Frank
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Insect Science 891
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 577
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 846
  • Ecology 614
  • Computational Mechanics 370
Replace S. Raghu with:
S. Raghu Australia
Baoming Chen China
Chunlong Liu China
William M. Healy United States
Joris Van Acker Belgium
Franck Richard France
Susanne Winter Germany
Jean‐Claude Ruel Canada
Mark O. Kimberley New Zealand
Andrew Peace United Kingdom
Thomas Frank relative to S. Raghu Australia S. Raghu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
S. Raghu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Frank

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Frank's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Frank with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Frank more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Frank

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Frank. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Frank. The network helps show where Thomas Frank may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Frank, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Frank Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Frank links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 101 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006350
2 2008233
3 199892
4 201292
5 200489
6 201087
7 199886
8 201484
9 200872
10 201267
11
Inhomogeneous MUSIG Model - a Population Balance Approach for Polydispersed Bubbly Flows
200567
12 200767
13 201960
14 200554
15 199852
16 200651
17 200750
18
Ground dwelling spiders (Araneae) in sown weed strips and adjacent fields
199549
19 200340
20 201140

About Thomas Frank

Thomas Frank is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology and Plant Science, having authored 101 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (31 papers), Plant and animal studies (25 papers), Mollusks and Parasites Studies (14 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (12 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Mixing (9 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (8 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (7 papers) and Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (891 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (577 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (846 citations), Ecology (614 citations) and Computational Mechanics (370 citations). Thomas Frank has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Eckhard Krepper, Dirk Lucas, Heinrich Manz, Paul Strachan, Gregory Maxwell, Johann G. Zaller, Peter G. Loutzenhiser, Clemens Felsmann, Horst-Michael Prasser and Dietmar Moser. Their work appears in journals such as Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, Nuclear Engineering and Design, Annals of Applied Biology, Basic and Applied Ecology and Journal of Applied Entomology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact