Thomas Drapela

25 papers receiving 604 citations

Peers

Thomas Drapela
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Insect Science 290
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 287
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 133
  • Soil Science 100
  • Plant Science 264
Replace Foster Forbes Purrington with:
Foster Forbes Purrington United States
Niu‐Niu Ji China
Cynthia L. Sagers United States
Paulo Sérgio Fiúza Ferreira Brazil
Benoît Ricci France
Gregory J. Pec Canada
Dawn M. Olson United States
Melanie Kammerer United States
Alan Kergunteuil Switzerland
Svenja Belaoussoff Canada
Thomas Drapela relative to Foster Forbes Purrington United States Foster Forbes Purrington's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
Foster Forbes Purrington · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Drapela

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Drapela's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Drapela with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Drapela more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Drapela

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Drapela. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Drapela. The network helps show where Thomas Drapela may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Drapela, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Drapela Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Drapela links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200777
2 200872
3 200767
4 201143
5 201040
6 200839
7 201139
8 200927
9 201227
10 200827
11 201121
12 201320
13 201118
14 201317
15 201317
16 201513
17 202112
18 201412
19 201111
20 200710

About Thomas Drapela

Thomas Drapela is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Ecology and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 27 papers that have together received 629 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (7 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (6 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (5 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (5 papers), Plant and animal studies (5 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (4 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (3 papers) and Isotope Analysis in Ecology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (290 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (287 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (133 citations), Soil Science (100 citations) and Plant Science (264 citations). Thomas Drapela has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Switzerland and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Johann G. Zaller, Dietmar Moser, Thomas Frank, Thomas Frank, Wolfgang Wanek, Alexander Bruckner, Olaf Schmidt, Pascal Querner, Roza Allabashi and Florian Heigl. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A Ecological Genetics and Physiology, Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, Ecography, Biology and Fertility of Soils and Basic and Applied Ecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact