Thomas Eberlein
Impact in
- Rehabilitation top 0.5%
- Wound Healing and Treatments
- Occupational Therapy top 1%
- Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
Papers in
-
- Wound Healing and Treatments 27
-
- Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management 10
- Co-authors
- Thomas Wild (4 shared papers)Arastoo Nia (1 shared paper)Lubos Sobotka (1 shared paper)Anneke Andriessen (12 shared papers)Ojan Assadian (5 shared papers)Robert Strohal (3 shared papers)Axel Krämer (4 shared papers)Joachim Dissemond (4 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Thomas Eberlein
37 papers receiving 855 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Rehabilitation 516
- Occupational Therapy 172
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 127
- Biomaterials 105
- Surgery 280
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Eberlein
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Eberlein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Eberlein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Eberlein more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Eberlein
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Eberlein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Eberlein. The network helps show where Thomas Eberlein may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Eberlein, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 253 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 69 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 68 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 49 | |
| 5 | 2002 | 49 | |
| 6 | Assessment of a wound cleansing solution in the treatment of problem wounds. | 2008 | 45 |
| 7 | Konsensusempfehlung zur Auswahl von Wirkstoffen fur die Wundantiseptik | 2004 | 44 |
| 8 | 2011 | 44 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 43 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 39 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 28 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 27 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 24 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 20 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 19 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 13 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 13 | |
| 18 | 2017 | 12 | |
| 19 | 2014 | 11 | |
| 20 | Wound cleansing efficacy of two cellulose-based dressings | 2010 | 11 |
About Thomas Eberlein
Thomas Eberlein is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Occupational Therapy, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Surgery and Dermatology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 933 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wound Healing and Treatments (27 papers), Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (10 papers), Surgical Sutures and Adhesives (9 papers), Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (6 papers), Antimicrobial agents and applications (3 papers), Dermatologic Treatments and Research (2 papers), Surgical site infection prevention (2 papers) and Clinical practice guidelines implementation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (516 citations), Occupational Therapy (172 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (127 citations), Biomaterials (105 citations) and Surgery (280 citations). Thomas Eberlein has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Bahrain. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Wild, Arastoo Nia, Lubos Sobotka, Anneke Andriessen, Ojan Assadian, Robert Strohal, Axel Krämer, Joachim Dissemond, Martin Abel and Jürg Traber. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Wound Care, Journal of Drugs in Dermatology, Skin Pharmacology and Physiology, Journal of Tissue Viability and British Journal of Dermatology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.