Thomas E. Richardson

39 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Thomas E. Richardson
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 256
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 385
  • Plant Science 597
  • Genetics 412
  • Molecular Biology 541
Replace Yuji Ide with:
Yuji Ide Japan
Stacey Lee Thompson Canada
M. Ángeles Guevara Spain
Jin‐Hua Ran China
Susan R. Kephart United States
Daniel Verhaegen France
Juliana Stival Sena Canada
Gerd Bossinger Australia
Tokuko Ujino‐Ihara Japan
Richard V. Kesseli United States
Thomas E. Richardson relative to Yuji Ide Japan Yuji Ide's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Yuji Ide · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas E. Richardson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas E. Richardson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas E. Richardson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas E. Richardson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas E. Richardson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas E. Richardson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas E. Richardson. The network helps show where Thomas E. Richardson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas E. Richardson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas E. Richardson Line = papers co-authored together Thomas E. Richardson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004166
2 198988
3 199685
4 199885
5 199564
6 199264
7 200158
8 200652
9 199151
10 199947
11 200035
12 199931
13 199431
14 200030
15
Dothistroma pini genetic diversity is low in New Zealand.
199929
16 200528
17 200625
18 198925
19 201424
20 199222

About Thomas E. Richardson

Thomas E. Richardson is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Molecular Biology and Cell Biology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (10 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (9 papers), Forest ecology and management (6 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (6 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (4 papers), Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (4 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (4 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (256 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (385 citations), Plant Science (597 citations), Genetics (412 citations) and Molecular Biology (541 citations). Thomas E. Richardson has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Andrew G. Stephenson, Sheree Cato, RICHARD C. F. GARDNER, Susan D. Biegel Carson, Paul J. Fisher, Craig S. Echt, Hanhui Kuang, Bruce C. Bongarten, Satish Kumar and Jack W. Kent. Their work appears in journals such as Theoretical and Applied Genetics, Evolution, Molecular Breeding, American Journal of Botany and The Journal of Organic Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact