Thomas E. Drake

25 papers receiving 444 citations

Peers

Thomas E. Drake
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Religious studies 34
  • Dermatology 58
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 197
  • Microbiology 31
  • Periodontics 22
Replace Meisheng Zhou with:
Meisheng Zhou Singapore
M. Stieber Germany
Mayumi Furukawa Japan
Hans-Ulrich Schmidt Germany
Mina Fazlollahi United States
Thomas Baumeister Germany
Evangelia Arvanitidou United States
T. Bragagna Liechtenstein
Qais Th. Algwari Iraq
Thomas E. Drake relative to Meisheng Zhou Singapore Meisheng Zhou's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.9×
Meisheng Zhou · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas E. Drake

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas E. Drake's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas E. Drake with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas E. Drake more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas E. Drake

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas E. Drake. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas E. Drake. The network helps show where Thomas E. Drake may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Thomas E. Drake, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas E. Drake Line = papers co-authored together Thomas E. Drake links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007124
2 195150
3 201147
4 197346
5 200846
6 197646
7 197642
8 200535
9 197320
10 200218
11 196713
12 200412
13 20019
14
Slavery and "The Woman Question": Lucretia Mott's Diary of Her Visit to Great Britain to Attend the World's Anti-Slavery Convention of 1840 (review)
19526
15 19745
16 20075
17
Low-Cost Ultrasonic Inspection of Composites for Aerospace Applications with LaserUT^【○!R】 Technology
20084
18 19514
19 19514
20 20053

About Thomas E. Drake

Thomas E. Drake is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Religious studies, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Mechanics of Materials and Computational Mechanics, having authored 27 papers that have together received 550 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment (5 papers), Solid State Laser Technologies (4 papers), Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques (3 papers), Laser Material Processing Techniques (3 papers), Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation (3 papers), Laser Design and Applications (3 papers), Contact Dermatitis and Allergies (2 papers) and Fungal Infections and Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (34 citations), Dermatology (58 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (197 citations), Microbiology (31 citations) and Periodontics (22 citations). Thomas E. Drake has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Marc Dubois, Alex Dergachev, Darrell J. Armstrong, William W. Sweet, Howard I. Maibach, Marc Dubois, Peter F. Moulton, Howard I. Maïbach, Robert J. Filkins and Kent Burr. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, JAMA, Optics Express, The William and Mary Quarterly and Journal of Cutaneous Pathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact