Thomas E. Burk

2.5k citations
92 papers · 2.0k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas E. Burk

85 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Thomas E. Burk
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.2k
  • Global and Planetary Change 1.1k
  • Environmental Engineering 583
  • Ecology 351
  • Ecological Modeling 58
Replace Kim Lowell with:
Kim Lowell Australia
Richard G. Oderwald United States
Edward J. Rykiel United States
Brian F. Walters United States
Andreas Schuck Finland
Richard Wadsworth United Kingdom
Raymond L. Czaplewski United States
Kevin Tolhurst Australia
W. Scott Overton United States
Alan R. Ek United States
Thomas E. Burk relative to Kim Lowell Australia Kim Lowell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Kim Lowell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas E. Burk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas E. Burk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas E. Burk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas E. Burk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas E. Burk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas E. Burk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas E. Burk. The network helps show where Thomas E. Burk may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas E. Burk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas E. Burk Line = papers co-authored together Thomas E. Burk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 92 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000317
2 1988177
3
Satellite inventory of Minnesota forest resources
1994159
4 1992117
5
Forest growth modelling and prediction
198879
6 201562
7 199659
8 198453
9 198146
10 198545
11 199343
12 200141
13 198641
14 201539
15 200639
16 200137
17 199330
18 198930
19 199329
20 201726

About Thomas E. Burk

Thomas E. Burk is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Environmental Engineering, Geography, Planning and Development and Ecology, having authored 92 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (46 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (20 papers), Forest Management and Policy (18 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (14 papers), Geographic Information Systems Studies (11 papers), Data Management and Algorithms (9 papers), Bioenergy crop production and management (7 papers) and Tree Root and Stability Studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.2k citations), Global and Planetary Change (1.1k citations), Environmental Engineering (583 citations), Ecology (351 citations) and Ecological Modeling (58 citations). Thomas E. Burk has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Alan R. Ek, J.C.G. Goelz, Ranga Raju Vatsavai, Göran I. Ågren, Chadwick Dearing Oliver, Pasi Puttonen, Annikki Mäkelä, J. J. Landsberg, Michael T. Ter‐Mikaelian and Shashi Shekhar. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Forest Science, Northern Journal of Applied Forestry, Forest Ecology and Management and Tree Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact