Thomas Drew-Bear
Impact in
- Classics top 5%
- Byzantine Studies and History
- Archeology top 1%
- Archaeology and Historical Studies
- Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History
- Ancient Near East History
- Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
Papers in
- Archeology 35
- Archaeology and Historical Studies 22
- Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History 17
- Ancient Egypt and Archaeology 11
- Ancient Near East History 6
- Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies 5
- Anthropology 27
- Classical Antiquity Studies 25
- Co-authors
- Michel Christol (17 shared papers)Claude Brixhe (4 shared papers)Jean-Claude Cheynet (2 shared papers)Jean-Pierre Sodini (1 shared paper)James Henry Oliver (1 shared paper)Christine M. Thomas (1 shared paper)Georges Le Rider (1 shared paper)Werner Eck (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Thomas Drew-Bear
31 papers receiving 202 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
- Classics 105
- Archeology 247
- Anthropology 205
- History 72
- Religious studies 35
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Drew-Bear
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Drew-Bear's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Drew-Bear with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Drew-Bear more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Drew-Bear
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Drew-Bear. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Drew-Bear. The network helps show where Thomas Drew-Bear may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Drew-Bear, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1972 | 43 | |
| 2 | 2004 | 40 | |
| 3 | 1977 | 34 | |
| 4 | Phrygian votive steles | 1999 | 29 |
| 5 | 1998 | 25 | |
| 6 | 1982 | 24 | |
| 7 | 1980 | 23 | |
| 8 | 1990 | 17 | |
| 9 | 1978 | 16 | |
| 10 | 2001 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 12 | 1999 | 7 | |
| 13 | 1968 | 7 | |
| 14 | 1995 | 4 | |
| 15 | 1995 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1994 | 4 | |
| 17 | 1987 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2003 | 4 | |
| 19 | Inscriptions de Dokimeion | 1988 | 3 |
| 20 | 1991 | 3 |
About Thomas Drew-Bear
Thomas Drew-Bear is a scholar working on Archeology, Anthropology, Classics, Religious studies and Philosophy, having authored 48 papers that have together received 347 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (25 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (22 papers), Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (17 papers), Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (11 papers), Ancient Near East History (6 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (5 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (4 papers) and African history and culture analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (105 citations), Archeology (247 citations), Anthropology (205 citations), History (72 citations) and Religious studies (35 citations). Thomas Drew-Bear has collaborated with scholars based in France and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Michel Christol, Claude Brixhe, Jean-Claude Cheynet, Jean-Pierre Sodini, James Henry Oliver, Christine M. Thomas, Georges Le Rider, Werner Eck, John Scheid and J. P. Sullivan. Their work appears in journals such as Kadmos, The American Journal of Philology, Antiquité Tardive, Tyche and Phoenix.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.