Thomas Drew

24 papers receiving 326 citations

Peers

Thomas Drew
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 57
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 19
  • Microbiology 18
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 20
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 57
Replace Kenji Bando with:
Kenji Bando Japan
Turgut Dönmez Türkiye
Franck Iserin France
Philip Bernard United States
M. D. Yohannan Saudi Arabia
Mounir Obeid Lebanon
Dawna J. Kramer United States
Olufemi Akindipe United States
Julie Wohrley United States
G Martet France
Thomas Drew relative to Kenji Bando Japan Kenji Bando's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×
Kenji Bando · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Drew

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Drew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Drew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Drew more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Drew

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Drew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Drew. The network helps show where Thomas Drew may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Drew, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Drew Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Drew links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200968
2 197632
3 198628
4 201822
5 201922
6 199022
7 201018
8 202116
9 201816
10 202013
11 199110
12 202210
13 19929
14 20119
15 19908
16 20197
17 20197
18 19867
19
SOX11 but not SOX4 is a prognostic marker for improved recurrence free survival in epithelial ovarian cancer
20093
20 20182

About Thomas Drew

Thomas Drew is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 29 papers that have together received 335 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (8 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (7 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (4 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (4 papers), Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (3 papers), Trauma Management and Diagnosis (3 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers) and Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (57 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (19 citations), Microbiology (18 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (20 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (57 citations). Thomas Drew has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Conán McCaul, David O. Williams, Mrinalini Balki, Keith L. Black, Ronald Altman, Martin Goldfield, Arun Kumar Singh, Kristi Downey, Sara Ek and Grainne Flannelly. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Anaesthesia, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, The Journal of Infectious Diseases and Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact