Thomas Diebold

695 citations
16 papers · 526 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Diebold

16 papers receiving 506 citations

Peers

Thomas Diebold
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 135
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 204
  • Internal Medicine 26
  • Surgery 238
  • Biomedical Engineering 166
Replace Thomas A. Demlow with:
Thomas A. Demlow United States
Ad H. Oostdijk Netherlands
Vitali Koch Germany
Dorothee Harder Switzerland
Timm Dirrichs Germany
Masanori Imuta Japan
Negareh Mousavi Canada
Fritz Schaefer Germany
J Kollath Germany
F. Lomoschitz Austria
Thomas Diebold relative to Thomas A. Demlow United States Thomas A. Demlow's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Thomas A. Demlow · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Diebold

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Diebold's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Diebold with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Diebold more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Diebold

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Diebold. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Diebold. The network helps show where Thomas Diebold may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Diebold, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Diebold Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Diebold links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2002144
2 1997112
3 200156
4 200341
5 200137
6 199924
7 200521
8 200520
9 200116
10 200515
11 199313
12 200212
13 200311
14
[Endovascular reconstruction of the infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm--experiences with 3 endovascular stent prosthesis systems].
19982
15 20061
16 20001

About Thomas Diebold

Thomas Diebold is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 16 papers that have together received 526 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (3 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (3 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (2 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (2 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (2 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (1 paper) and Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (135 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (204 citations), Internal Medicine (26 citations), Surgery (238 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (166 citations). Thomas Diebold has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Thomas J. Vogl, Selami Doğan, K. Hochmuth, Anton Moritz, Christopher Herzog, K. Engelmann, Nasreddin Abolmaali, Norbert P. Südkamp, Roland Felix and Susanne Bisson. Their work appears in journals such as European Radiology, Investigative Radiology, Radiology, RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren and Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact