Thomas Deckers

16 papers receiving 577 citations

Peers

Thomas Deckers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • General Decision Sciences 122
  • Safety Research 191
  • Applied Psychology 49
  • Demography 70
  • Accounting 65
Replace Fabian Kosse with:
Fabian Kosse Germany
Emma von Essen Sweden
Stefan Volk Australia
Bernhard von Rosenbladt Germany
Carmit Segal Switzerland
Ennio Bilancini Italy
Colm Harmon Germany
Tom Lane China
Keith P. Sentis United States
Kristian Ove R. Myrseth United Kingdom
Thomas Deckers relative to Fabian Kosse Germany Fabian Kosse's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Fabian Kosse · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Deckers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Deckers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Deckers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Deckers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Deckers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Deckers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Deckers. The network helps show where Thomas Deckers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Deckers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Deckers Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Deckers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2012300
2 202179
3 201269
4 201862
5 201728
6 201211
7 20158
8 20128
9 20136
10 20166
11 20165
12 20124
13 20133
14
How Does Socio-Economic Status Shape a Child's Personality?
20142
15 20162
16
Multiple Testing in Growth Econometrics
20101

About Thomas Deckers

Thomas Deckers is a scholar working on Social Psychology, General Decision Sciences, Sociology and Political Science, Safety Research and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 594 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (6 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (5 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (4 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (3 papers), Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies (3 papers), Economic theories and models (2 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (2 papers) and Ethics in Business and Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (122 citations), Safety Research (191 citations), Applied Psychology (49 citations), Demography (70 citations) and Accounting (65 citations). Thomas Deckers has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Armin Falk, Fabian Kosse, Thomas Dohmen, Anke Becker, Hannah Schildberg-Hörisch, Pia Pinger, Christoph Hanck and Nora Szech. Their work appears in journals such as The B E Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Journal of Political Economy, Macroeconomic Dynamics and Annual Review of Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact