Thomas Debeir

2.4k citations
38 papers · 1.9k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Debeir

38 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Thomas Debeir
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Developmental Neuroscience 180
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 836
  • Neurology 355
  • Biological Psychiatry 87
  • Physiology 543
Replace Susan D. Kraner with:
Susan D. Kraner United States
Martín A. Bruno Canada
Albert Giralt Spain
Koen Bossers Netherlands
Mariaelena Repici Italy
Binggui Sun China
Silvia Di Angelantonio Italy
Javad Mirnajafi‐Zadeh Iran
Philip Hasel United Kingdom
Zu‐Cheng Ye United States
Thomas Debeir relative to Susan D. Kraner United States Susan D. Kraner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Susan D. Kraner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Debeir

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Debeir's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Debeir with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Debeir more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Debeir

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Debeir. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Debeir. The network helps show where Thomas Debeir may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Debeir, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Debeir Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Debeir links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006247
2 2007195
3 1999165
4 2006110
5 199997
6 201196
7 200089
8 199883
9 200577
10 200771
11 200269
12 200561
13 200758
14 200052
15 201140
16 201534
17 201633
18 201731
19 201630
20 199630

About Thomas Debeir

Thomas Debeir is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Physiology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nerve injury and regeneration (10 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (8 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (8 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (4 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (4 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (4 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (4 papers) and Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (180 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (836 citations), Neurology (355 citations), Biological Psychiatry (87 citations) and Physiology (543 citations). Thomas Debeir has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include A. Claudio Cuello, H. Uri Saragovi, Thomas Klockgether, Michael T. Heneka, Karen Duff, Tak Pan Wong, Rita Raisman‐Vozari, Merle Ruberg, Françis C. Colpaert and Sergei Maliartchouk. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental Neurology, Journal of Neuroscience, Molecular Pharmacology, Brain Research and Neurobiology of Aging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact