Thomas Dayspring

882 citations
33 papers · 617 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Dayspring

29 papers receiving 590 citations

Peers

Thomas Dayspring
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 183
  • Surgery 342
  • Cancer Research 101
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 44
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 125
Replace Eliscer Guzman with:
Eliscer Guzman United States
G R Warnick United States
Graeme W. Tait United Kingdom
Amir F. Ayyobi Canada
Nancy Phillips United States
J Patsch Austria
Amal Zerrad-Saadi France
Matthias Nauck Germany
K Nilsell Sweden
Perry L. Colvin United States
Thomas Dayspring relative to Eliscer Guzman United States Eliscer Guzman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×21×
Eliscer Guzman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Dayspring

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Dayspring's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Dayspring with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Dayspring more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Dayspring

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Dayspring. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Dayspring. The network helps show where Thomas Dayspring may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Dayspring, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Dayspring Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Dayspring links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012208
2 201353
3 202044
4 201443
5 201528
6 200825
7 201123
8 200621
9 201220
10 201419
11 201419
12 201115
13 201014
14 200613
15 201212
16 201412
17 20158
18 20147
19
Coronary heart disease in women: triglycerides and lipoprotein biology.
20035
20 20185

About Thomas Dayspring

Thomas Dayspring is a scholar working on Surgery, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Cancer Research, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Molecular Biology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 617 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health (20 papers), Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (11 papers), Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism (10 papers), Lipid metabolism and disorders (6 papers), Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism (6 papers), Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer (3 papers), Fatty Acid Research and Health (3 papers) and Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (183 citations), Surgery (342 citations), Cancer Research (101 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (44 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (125 citations). Thomas Dayspring has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter P. Tóth, Binh An P. Phan, Joseph P. McConnell, William S. Harris, Dawn L. Thiselton, G. Russell Warnick, Daniel M Hoefner, Stephen A. Varvel, Cheryl Keech and Yongming Qu. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of clinical lipidology, Current Atherosclerosis Reports, Gender Medicine, Expert Opinion on Drug Safety and Vascular Health and Risk Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact